T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
In his book, What's the Matter with Kansas, Thomas Frank documented the emergence of an angry populist movement in the prairielands. Christian fundamentalists and anti-abortion activists had exploited the anxiety of working class midwesterners by fabricating a persuasive myth of persecution. According to the myth, a tyrannical minority of liberal elites in control of the media and judiciary seek to repress the religious practices and traditions of "regular Americans" whom they despise and disdain.
Though liberals represent the bogeymen in the conservative horror fantasies Frank described in 2004, they were not participants in the pitched political battles that roiled Kansas. Kansas has always been a reliably Republican state; there are no liberals to battle. Instead, the war in Kansas pitted right-wing conservatives against moderate conservatives, "Cons" versus "Mods." According to Frank, the Cons emerged victorious and effectively wrested complete control of Kansas politics.
But elsewhere in the country, the Republican establishment courted the Cons, regarding them as a potent political force against Democrats -- just as the Roman Emperor Valens invited the Visigoths to settle in Roman territory, seeing in them "a splendid recruiting ground for his army." And so, like the Visigoths, the Cons are now sacking the Republican establishment.
The conflict bloodily presented itself during the special congressional election of NY-23. Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, a devotee of paranoid conspiracist Glenn Beck, challenged the moderate Republican candidate, Dede Scozzafava. Con leaders like Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh enthusiastically endorsed Hoffman and labeled Scozzafava a RINO -- Republican in name only. Limbaugh's taunts were even more vicious and puerile than his usual attacks on Democrats. He accused Scozzafava of "bestiality" for having "screwed every RINO in the country."
The result: Scozzafava dropped out of the race. Despite Hoffman's loss, Cons are trumpeting their success against the Mods and preparing 2010 campaigns against Mods like Florida Governor Charlie Christ. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs stated, "If you look at what I think is likely to happen next year, you already have Republicans -- some Republicans who are more aligned with the very conservative element of what's happening in New York saying, this is a model for what you'll see throughout the country."
As Republican Mods drift toward extinction, the Cons have not given up their persecution myths. As one Con writes, "The Republican Party has been hijacked. Conservatives have been driven underground by the RINOs..." (If the current explosion of right-wing paranoia constitutes being driven "underground," imagine what above-ground Cons looks like.) Hoffman even applied the persecution myth to his election loss, accusing Democrats of election fraud in the final hours of voting: "There are reports that they're bringing in the troops and they're bringing in ACORN. I think the Democrats are doing anything they possibly can to steal this election away from the 23rd district." (Hoffman thought that the tires of one of his supporters had been slashed. The culprit turned out to be a broken bottle on the road.)
Democrats, meanwhile, have celebrated Hoffman's loss and the turmoil within the Republican party. But like another Roman Emperor, Democratic revelers are fiddling as Rome burns. While the Cons' political ideology may not be shared by independents and moderate Republican voters, the differences do not mean that they will vote Democrat. American politics is cyclical, and the nation will sooner or later vote the Democrats out of office. If paranoid extremists like Doug Hoffman control the Republican Party at that time, the Bush years will seem like an era of unfettered liberalism.
Discover everything that you never wanted to know about conservative paranoia at my Persecution Politics series at dagblog.com.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
Extremist Doug Hoffman? lol
idiot
jerk-blog
You must have mistyped. There are plenty of Jerk Blogs all over the Internet, many offering limited free content. Or so I've been told.
GagBlog.com
So it doesn't register with you at all that the Republican Scuzzy-fava leaned far left and once she left the race, endorsed a Democrat? So, say this happened to your party, oh, wait, it has and y'all didn't like it.
The dems are OUT OF TOUCH with the American public. Conservative values are alive and well and while you boast about ONE loss, you should focus on the other wins and then spew your vitriole against normal Americans not wanting their country hijacked by Marxist communists. You label us, we label you. With your views, you are indeed for tyrannical goverment with marxist overtones which lead to a communist mentality.
You should stop spewing so much "hate"...libs love to accuse the "extremist" right about Hate and make laws to punish them but I've never, in my life, seen so much hate and intolerance coming from your side. Open your eyes man - liberalism and socialism does NOT work, if you think it does, then tell me why NY, California, Illinois and many other populated states are going bankrupt handing out workers paychecks to those staying at home and running business out of their states with high taxes...hmmm? barack hussein obama, mmmmm mmmmm mmmm
Thanks for sharing. I'm glad that you found the title of this article to be an engrossing read. I share your concerns about protecting normal Americans from Marxists communists. That is why I've started a new telephone hotline for people in trouble: 1-900-THEMARXISTSAREAFTERME. Due to high volume, there may be an extended wait time. Please be patient.
Ever since the Democrats broke up Ma Bell (in one version of history, at least), telephones became part of the conspiracy. You can't trust them!
Your blogs seem to attract the real quality commenters, Genghis.
Oh wait.
Man, I love a good Visigoth reference.
The Visigoths get all the PR, but the real goons in the story were the Alans. Which makes you realize how important branding is, right? 'Cause NOBODY is gonna tremble when they hear the Alans are at the gate. Like, Alan Alda or Alan Arkin? See?
"The Alans." Fail.
What about the poor Vandals? You loot a little here and there as you migrate, and pretty soon you have an "ism" named after you. Not at all fair.
G, I'm curious as to whether you've read this critique of Frank's book by Princeton's Larry Bartels. It's a pretty sharp rebuttal to Frank's thesis in Kansas and worth the read IMHO.
I've skimmed the debate on both sides. My inclination is to avoid the issue to the extent that I can. I think that class-based political generalizations are fraught with problems, as evidenced by the Frank-Bartels controversy, which seems to be largely a debate about how to define "working class." What I value in Frank's book is not the sweeping social history of Kansas politics, but the documentation of a new political movement. In my own book, I'll be focusing on the evolution and promulgation of the ideas. I do not think that the appeal of these ideas is inherently class-specific, though I expect that they are more popular among certain social-economic-gender demographics. I've been looking for FOX target demographics, but I haven't found any breakdowns except by age.