Genghis: Santorum Versus.... Satan!
Erica20: Selling Cookies For the Radical Homosexual Agenda
dagblog Is Sexy and It Knows It
|
Genghis: Santorum Versus.... Satan! Erica20: Selling Cookies For the Radical Homosexual Agenda dagblog Is Sexy and It Knows It |
Read |
The article about referees "blowing the whistle" on oil companies was quite energizing. (Heh heh.) So I'm recycling this comment from 2010.
Important parts bolded--the rest included for context. Main point is that Progressives, "True" Conservatives and Economic Tea Partiers have reason to agree on the issue of big money in politics.
Dr. Reich,
I know it would be preferable to have actual laws that require campaign financing, but couldn't we just make our own?
What if we all (Progressive Democrats, "True" Conservatives, Tea Partiers who thought the bank bailout was a vast pander) issue an ultimatum:
Take Their Money, Lose My Vote!
I've been struck by the fact that Progressives seem to feel that Politicians are in the tank for Corporations, while Tea Partiers seem to feel that Corporations are in the tank for Politicians. But either way, Government and Corporations are in the tank, and we're not. Both Democrats and Republicans have a right to be, as you put it, Mad as Hell about this. Could a "take their money, lose my vote" initiative be bipartisan?
We could let 'em down easy, by saying how much in corporate donations could be spent on each race, or make 'em go cold turkey and rely on individual contributions. But between Wall Street and The Big Easy, maybe there's finally enough outrage coming from the little people that something like this could take hold....
Outstanding article:
Prominent Republicans keep hoping for someone to rescue them from its slate of mediocre candidates. But the party’s biggest problem is the ideological bloodlust of its base.
The bombshell dropped in Saturday’s Playbook, the chattering-class email sent out every morning by the Politico’s Mike Allen. If Mitt Romney fails to win Michigan next Tuesday, a few high-powered Republicans have started saying, the party needs to go back to square one and recruit a new candidate. Yes, maybe it does. But what will that fix? Not much. What the party needs is not simply a new candidate. It needs someone with the courage to stand up and say that the GOP has gone completely off the deep end—and that the party could run an amalgam of Ronald Reagan and Mahatma Gandhi and he wouldn’t win as long as the party’s inflamed base keeps with its current attitudes. But it lacks such a person utterly. It’s a party made up of on the one hand unprincipled cowards, and on the other of people devoted to principles so extreme that they’d have serious trouble attracting more than about 42 percent of the vote.
The report continues with viable and on target points.
The 'rescue package' appears to reduce interest rates on some bonds held by hedge funds and banks, while more than making up for that 'relief' with a new EU loan which is more than the purported savings on the previous bonds. This is 'relief'? For Greece or hedge funds and banks?
...The deal in Brussels gives Greece its second financial lifeline in less than two years — a combined package of foreign loans equivalent to about €22,000 ($29,000) for every Greek citizen, children included. National debt already amounts to about €32,000 ($42,300) each....
By Vladimir Putin, ForeignPolicy.com, Feb. 21, 2012
[....] It is no surprise that some are calling for resources of global significance to be freed from the exclusive sovereignty of a single nation. This cannot happen to Russia, not even hypothetically [....]
Editor's note: A longer version of this article appeared in the Russian newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta.
By Steve Bertoni, Forbes Magazine, Feb. 21, 2012
[....] The man whose net worth, by Forbes’ calculations, has jumped more ($21.6 billion) during the Obama administration than any other American — Mark Zuckerberg included — wants to take the president out for economic reasons. “What scares me is the continuation of the socialist-style economy we’ve been experiencing for almost four years. That scares me because the redistribution of wealth is the path to more socialism, and to more of the government controlling people’s lives. What scares me is the lack of accountability that people would prefer to experience, just let the government take care of everything and I’ll go fish or I won’t work, etc.”
“U.S. domestic politics is very important to me because I see that the things that made this country great are now being relegated into duplicating that which is making other countries less great. … I’m afraid of the trend where more and more people have the tendency to want to be given instead of wanting to give. People are less willing to share. There are fewer philanthropists being grown and there are greater expectations of the government. I believe that people will come to their senses and not extend the current Administration’s quest to socialize this country. It won’t be a socialist democracy because it won’t be a democracy.” [....]
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has added another 30 minutes to upcoming arguments over President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. The sessions now will span six hours over three days in late March.
The breakdown of the three central topics to be heard are in body of report.
This is a critical decision for all.
The truth is that we have the government the majority deserves due to the vast majority of We, The People not standing up and speaking out armed with facts and positive intent. This campaign finance debacle is indeed (IMHO) proof positive of how apathy, choosing to be ignorant and neglect by the masses delivers exactly what is in place.
Most do not accept the truth, that the operations and practices of our government is a reflection of our society's choices (at the forefront is abdication of individual responsibility to be factually informed and involved).
Whether it's campaign finance, immigration or a myriad of other issues that we have neglected to deal with at the onset, we have the end result of chaos and corruption.