Wattree's picture

    The Democratic Party is Either Asleep at the Switch, Intimidated, or in Collusion with the Domestic Enemies of America

    Beneath the Spin * Eric L. Wattree

    The Democratic Party is Either Asleep at the Switch, Intimidated, or in Collusion with the Domestic Enemies of America

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt established the Democratic Party as the party of the people. Its primary mandate became protecting the average American from all those who sought to do them harm. But the current Democratic party is falling down in that regard in a very big way. When historians look back upon this period - and due to the election of the nation’s first Black president, they’re definitely going to scrutinize this period like no other - history is going to reflect that during one of the most brutal internal assaults on America since the Civil War Democrats were more interested in their individual careers than they were the American people. So at this point I’m going to do something that I’ve never done in print before - I’m going to speak strictly as a Black man.

    I feel like I’ve been on a roller coaster every since Barack Obama appeared on the American scene. I’ve gone from being hopeful when he threw his hat into the ring, to ecstatic when it became clear that he was a viable candidate. I then went from disappointed when he backslid on FISA, to solemn when America elected him. Then I became angry when he failed to adhere to the law and make Bush and Cheney answer for their “alleged” war crimes. Now the only word suitable to reflect the way I feel is embarrassed. I’m embarrassed that while Americans are under one of the greatest threats from a domestic enemy in our history, the most persistent word coming from the mouth of the nation’s first Black President’s is “compromise.”

    Neville Chamberlain demonstrated conclusively leading up to WWII that you cannot compromise with a malevolent enemy, and that’s exactly what the GOP has become. They’ve demonstrated unequivocally that they have absolutely no regard for the American people, and they’re on a single-minded mission to utterly destroy the American middle class. Indisputable evidence of that is in less than six months they’ve tried to throw America’s unemployed under the bus, along with first responders, police, firefighters, teachers, and nurses, while at the very same time they’re giving tax cuts, subsidies, and preferential treatment to the most profitable multinational corporations in the world.

    While in terms of policy, I expect our presidents to simply be American and not cater to any particular racial, ethnic, or special interest group, I also expect them to bring the benefit of their life experience to the way they approach their job - after all, that’s why most Black people worked so hard to elect a Black president, so we would finally have someone in office who understood the Black experience in this country. But it seems that President Obama is so afraid that Rush Limbaugh is going to accuse him of liking Black people that he’s walking on eggshells. So not only is Obama NOT catering to Black people, but he’s overcompensating by going out of his way to negate his experience as a Black man.  As a result he’s doing a gross disservice to the American people as a whole.

    Obama’s experience as a Black man would be invaluable in addressing the situation that the nation is currently facing. It has become clear that the GOP is undoubtedly on a mission to destroy the American middle class. To be graphically frank, the GOP leadership is on a fascist-inspired mission to make ALL of the poor and middle class, of every race, the new niggas.

    Obama’s experience as a Black man would be invaluable in addressing the situation that the nation is currently facing. It has become clear that the GOP is undoubtedly on a mission to destroy the American middle class. To be graphically frank, the GOP leadership is on a fascist-inspired mission to make ALL of the poor and middle class, of every race, the new niggas.

    But as the Tea Party clearly demonstrates, many White people can’t even visualize such a thing happening in America. Black people are under no illusions, however. We clearly see what’s going on. While most White people can’t even imagine a totalitarian situation being established in America, Black people not only know that it can happen, but that it’s happened before on a selective basis, because we’ve lived under Jim Crow. So by negating the benefit of his perspective, and his unique source of knowledge, Obama is doing the American people a very grave disservice. He’s not speaking out on a looming threat to American in fear of people misinterpreting his concern as a “Black thing” - or Black paranoia.

    Thus, instead of saying “We should look forward, and not Back” with regard to Bush and Cheney’s war crimes in Iraq, as a Black man with a knowledge of the Black experience in America, Obama should have been in the very forefront of the fight to initiate an investigation, then prosecuting both Bush, Cheney, and everyone in the administration involved in that atrocity. Because by illegally instructing his attorney general to “not to look back,” he effectively relegated Bush and Cheney to a class that is above the law.

    As both a Black man, and a constitutional lawyer, Obama should have recognized that the failure to follow the rule of law, and the establishment of a class that is above the law, is what led directly to Black people being lynched with impunity in the South. Now, as a direct result of his failure to take decisive action, the Republican congress, essentially, has an entire religion on trial as “Islamofascists.” That’s a very slippery slope. How far will it go? First, they rightly went after terrorists, but then it became all Muslims. Next it may be Black Muslims, then Black people as a whole, then liberals, then anyone who disagrees with them at all.

    The GOP has a hidden agenda. That’s become abundantly clear by their concerted assault on middle-class workers across the country. They claim that their primary concern is the deficit and the welfare of the American people, yet they held the very survival of the families of unemployed Americans hostage to force a tax cut for the top 2% of the population that will exceed $4 trillion over the next ten years. They also claim that they’re for smaller government, yet Gov. Rick Snyder of Michigan has hatched a plan to takeover every town and city in the state by installing “Emergency Managers” with the authority to cancel labor agreements and overrule the people by firing elected officials. And they say that they are for a strict constructionist interpretation of the constitution, yet the Republican congress has passed a bill saying that it will become law even without being ratified by the Democratic senate.

    Every one of those actions are grossly un-American, and constitutes totalitarianism. Even the Tea party is beginning to see it, so where is the Democratic outrage?

    So it’s time for the American unengaged to wake up, turn off Entertainment Tonight, and read a history book. It’s also time for the Democrats, including Barack Obama and his cheerleaders, to look past the next election and think about America for a change. That would be a change we could believe in.

    Eric L. Wattree

    http://wattree.blogspot.com/
    [email protected]
    Citizens Against Reckless Middle-Class Abuse (CARMA)

    Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

    Comments

    Wow!

    I go up and down on these takes on our President.

    I swear, sometimes I go back to old articles on the fascists who ran this country in the previous administration.

    But I tell ya you have come up with one hell of a slogan or a beginning of a slogan anyway.

    Domestic Enemies.

    No Shite!!

    Our real domestic enemies wish to destroy Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, health care legislation of any kind, food stamps, unions, and just about every domestic program on the books.There was one bill floating around in the Minnesota Legislature making it a crime for anyone on disability or welfare to have over $20.00 in cash over a period of a month!

    The repubs wish to institute new tax cuts for the rich and for corporations when most big corporations are not paying any taxes as it is. And they are already accomplishing this on the state level.

    I have never seen such a bold affront on my America in my lifetime.

    If a repub gets in the WH with an even luke warm Congress, it is all over.

    We are done.


    Richard,

    I completely agree with you. I don't think most Americans know how close we are to becoming a fascist state. I am literally, and genuinely, frightened.  I've made a note to update my passport so I can get the hell out of here if I think that there is even a chance of the GOP winning the White House, because these people have no limits or shame. 

    I've become convinced that many in the GOP are so dumb that they don't understand what America is all about. And can you believe that bill that states, in the bill itself, that it becomes law even without senate ratification?!!!  Are they crazy?! 


    I'm curious that as a black man, the unemployment rate at 15.5% among blacks isn't high in your commentary.

    Somewhere I expect that down the line there will be a great bit of disgruntlement that not only didn't things at least stabilize for the black community after 8 awful years under Bush, progress went still backwards.

    But then that's the view from a white cracker. Might be I'm missing something.


    Desider,

    First, the only thing that stabilized under the Bush was the culture of corruption. As for the Black unemployment rate, there are some things in this country that makes even that pale in comparison. The GOP has become so radical that the economy has become merely a distraction.  I'm more worried about our democracy at this point. The United States is at the same point that Germany was just prior to the rise of Adolph Hitler - and that's not hyperbole. All the GOP needs is a charismatic leader and America will cease to exist as we know it. 


    Well, you are using hyperbole.

    But my queston was about Obama and unemployment, not about the GOP. Democrats control the White House and the Senate, and had the House until January, yet we keep turning questions around as if 2008's election never happened.

    Where's the urgency with job programs? Why's this guy asleep at the wheel?


    Desider,

    I'm not here to defend Obama, but I think he's done a pretty good job considering the fact that the GOP is fighting him tooth-n-nail to keep America ignorant, divided, and miserable until the 2012 election. The corporatists are making record profits, but they continue to send jobs overseas because the GOP has sponsored legislation giving the them tax breaks for doing so. they also have a vested interest in not creating jobs in the U.S.  The higher the unemployment rate, the better chance the GOP has of being returned to power and returning the business evironment to the corrupt status quo that they enjoyed under Bush.

    Now, let me aske you a question.  When was the last time we had a Republican president who didn't preside over an economic disaster?

     


    Yes, sorry to chime in again but we have Ike and then....

    But Ike was interested, and I mean truly interested in the over-all good for his people.

    I believe that.

    Did he do enough for Civil Rights?

    But he took over a country that was socialist to the core following the wars; and the right wished to destroy all the programs; prewar and war. And he said: NO WAY!

    I have nothing else, just caught up in your comment.


    That's exactly right, Richard.

    In addition, as his very last act of office he warned the American people to beware of the corruption of the military/industrial complex. In other words, the current Republicans and their Democratic crime partners.

     


    Well I don't think Bush Sr. was an economic disaster, and by the end of the Reagan years, I don't think it was a complete disaster (after he pragmatically shifted gears and raised taxes and became responsible).

    But anyway, you give Obama a pass despite not fighting for a real job stimulus. "GOP fighting him tooth and nail". He had both houses of Congress.


    Desider,

    Obama has only had two years to reverse eight years of GOP destruction. In addition, he's already saved the nation of another Great Depression. But give him at least one term before you pass judgement on him.


    Hey, E.  I may be reading incompletely, and I first read this via email early this morning, but I wasn't quite sure how you were tying Obama and the GOP grabs together.  I wanted to be sure this was a good video to put up; I'll take the chance, and come back later.

     


    Stardust, when I saw this was 26 minutes, I confess, I thought, "Oy, I'll just try a snippet," but I couldn't stop watching.  Thanks for posting this.  It was very interesting.  Sad, but interesting and thought-provoking.


    Glad you liked it, CVille; he just knocks me out, and he has been rigorous in critiquing the President after working sooo hard to get him elected.  I'm sure he's sad by what he's watched, but the issues he beleieves in are too important to pussyfoot around with.  ;o)  I know Cornell has his detractors, but I can't really imagine why.


    I can't really imagine why

    Cornel West is so fuckin smart, he bumps all the iq's in the room up a standard deviation just by dropping by.  You might could even catch some extra smart over the radio, who knows..


    Besides smart, I think he's pretty wise, too; shoot, if I could go to a church with a man like him up front, and some damned fine singin', I just might!   ;o)

    You might like to watch Michael Eric Dyson on DemocracyNow! later; he's discussing Manning Mirabale's new book on Malcolm X, which seems to be of a whole new caliber with first-hand accounts and a much wider perspective.  (Mirabale died a few days ago before the book's publication).  I've been so frustrated by the fear his name brings up at websites when I, or others, try to remind people how incredibly important he was to the civil rights movement.

    And today is the day MLK was assassinated, and the anniversary of his speech at Riverside Church (transcript here);  "Beyond Viet Nam: Time to Break the Silence"  (hate to put up another video).


    Stardust

    The problem is, Obama in not speaking out or doing anything, like trying to educate the people, to protect the American people from the GOP. He's just sitting back and allowing it to happen.  He's doing more for the people of Libya than he is for the people of Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

    And before anyone asks, no, I'm not suggesting he put up a no-fly zone over Michigan.  But he could speak out on behalf of worker's rights - and I don't mean once or twice, but every day.


    His failures run deeper than that, IMO; he seems almost too comfortable with too much triangulation.  I just didn't know how you got from A-to-B-to-C was all.  I couldn't see the progression.  He knows exactly for whom he speaks, and it clearly isn't working people. 

    Not so sure he did the Libyans much of a favor, but we won't go there.  ;o)


    I agree, Stardust.

    The bigger favor was done for the military/indusrtial complex - $600 million and counting for one weeks work - so far.


    Stardust,

    I have very littler respect got Cornel West.  He's self-serving and he has Tavis Smiley's hand in his back. West started going after then Senator Obama while he was still running for office.  He and his puppet master, Tavis Smiley, has been egaged in a one-way feud with Obama every since Obama refused to come on Tavis' corporate sponsored dog-and-pony show during the campaign.

    I used to respect West because I took his build-up in the corporate press at face value.  But after he and Smiley became so petty toward Obama during the campaign I actually started listening to him every chance I got, and eventually came to the conclusion that he's just a guy that likes to hear himself talk.

    Nine times out of ten, you can depend on West telling the people what they want to hear, instead of what they need to hear. 

     


    Yes; I'd forgotten you disliked him.  Too bad, really.


    p.s. The rules say I'm not supposed to call you a bigoted idiot for not liking his message, which is altogether separate from you 'self-serving' critique (as if he has something 'to win') so I won't.  ;o)


    Stardust,

    Question: How does having little respect for Cornel West constitute bigotry?  Cornel West in the pocket of Tavis Smiley, a man who fronts programs touted as "The State of the Black Union" with the sponsoring logos of not only some of the worse exploiters of the Black community emblazoned in the background, but are also the worse exploiters of America as a whole.  One Black man pointed out that one of Tavis' sponsors told him that they couldn't pay him for the destruction of his home after Hurricane Katrina because "Katrina wasn't windy enough."

    So you call me a "bigoted idiot" if you like, because I hold such people in disdain, but that's alright. I'll just have to live with that.


    No; I said it wrong and tried to explain somewhere on the thread.  I was woofing at you for not challenging his ideas, but instead his personality and motives ('self-serving; WTH??), and keeping company with a man you don't like.  My premise I stand by, but I was making an attempt at humor which failed.  The threads (which I did foget you don't even look at other diaries here it seems) were full of heated discussions of the ways we could address each other in comments.  I was trying to turn bigotry on its head a bit: Black Man Disses Black Man; Is Bigoted Idiot. 

    Sponsors?  I dunno.  Questionable or worse sponsor environmental organizations now; it's a problem if affects the content of the show, or the hosts pull their punches.  GE/MSNBC: You and I may disagree on its corporate influence.  Dunno.  Sorry to rile you; guess I got it wrong.


    I liked his comments concerning the 'bi-partisanship' meme starting around 19:00. Thanks Stardust


    Me, too, Obey.  'You have to be partisan before you can engage in bipartisanship', or close.  I also liked the focus on the prison/industrial complex: Marshall Plans.  Ive watched him on enough community panels working to empower the poor and getting-poorer to know that he's the Real Deal.  I enjoy hearing him and Desmond Tutu a lot.  They seem to be able to teach me that anger ain't enough on its own, and the place that love and community have to hold in pushback against the PTB.


    So what's Mr. Wattree's beef with him?


    E. says above; and I'd forgotten he's said the same things about him a year or so ago, so he's consistent.  Tavis Smiley seems to be regarded poorly, even waaaay downthread.  But as to his being self-serving, I don't get it.  I mean all these folks have some ego, so I wonder if some on the thread see him as too critical of Obama.  A-man says below that he was critical of him even as he was helping him get elected (he was also on Obama's Black Advisory board). 

    His criticism was what prompted me to play around with my 'don't diss The Brother' thing; I see I failed spectacularly at it by doing it short-hand.  But it fit with the recent spate of accusations on other threads about 'uncivil remarks to opponents here' thing.  One trouble: I'd forgotten that E almost never gets on other threads here, so he likely wasn't even aware.  (Sorry, E.)  ;o)

    Shoot, though; Dan K was even asked below if he were calling the President an Uncle Tom; we do seem to have trouble communicating at times, and mine here was my fault.


    One of the biggest problems the Democrats have and the the left in general has is they have become policy wonks and technocrats and to an extent, elitist snobs. They try to make their points with data and graphs and statistics and academic mumbo-jumbo that would put a college student to sleep.

    What came to mind with me is an old movie with Jack Lemon and Walter Matthau call The Fortune Cookie.

    Matthau's character  in the opening scenes is shown with his client all bandaged up in a wheel chair looking as pitiful as can be done. Matthau's character  gets the settlement of course from this.

    The point being he uses his client as THE example of supposed negligence which of course would win him a bigger settlement from the jury.

    So what the the Democrats need to do to get their agenda through to the people is to use specific examples of what the right has done and will do.  Forget the policy and statistics and other junk. That just goes over most peoples heads and they simply do not care.

    But example after example after example. Constantly pushed will get the public on their side.

    Rather like this did.

    And this one.

    And this one.

    And finally this one.

     

    Specific examples  and hit hard and below the belt. Fight dirty because you know damn well they will.


    I am so sick of hearing that we are a bunch of elitist snobs!  Heaven forbid that a graph, or scientific fact would get into the discussion!  When you have close to a majority of people thinking that adam and eve rode to work on a saddled up dinosaur, maybe it is high time for some facts.

    I agree that the ads you show are effective because they hit at an emotional level, and god knows we need to do that as well.  But I resent the implication that relying on facts (which are well-explained with the briefness of a graph) makes a person an elitist or a snob.

    Wanting a President you could have a beer with got us Dubya.  Wanting one who could play the role of President got us Reagan.  The very fact of President Obama's intelligence is part of what right-wingers hate, so they call him an elitist, but continuously go after him with fake stories about his BIRTH!  

    OK, OK, so what if caring about science and truth, and THE ACTUAL WORDS IN THE CONSTITUTION make one an elitist.  What label are you willing to put on those who traffic solely on ridiculous made-up stories to scare people who believe every word they say with no filter?  

    Would you call them "Real Americans," as they like to be called? How about "Hard-working taxpayers,"  or "Red-Blooded?"  Because by calling themselves that, they intend to exclude all the other real Americans, who pay their taxes and work hard, and have red blood in their veins, just about of pure hatred for anyone who believes in the concept of the Common Good.

    I personally, would call them selfish.  I would say that they are indifferent to those less fortunate.  And, I would also call them dangerous.

     


    Would you rather be right or effective?  The Recons have been very effective, even though they are "wrong" most of the time.  Most people vote from their gut, not their head.  Stats, facts and graphs are just not reptillian enough to get the job done.

     


    Well said. Hitler did not get into office with facts.


    So, to paraphrase: We have to destroy the country in order to save it.

    is this a zero sum game? Do you have to be right OR effective? Right-wingers are effective because they say stuff like Huckabe about the MaoMao rebellion (which he certainly knew was bogus) and even though he walked it back, it was intentionally done to leave an odor in the air.

    We point out Newts multiple wives and lack of character, which are TRUE, and no one bats an eye. Prostitutes, diapers, financial shenanigans pepper the repub landscape and no one cares. Frankly I can't imagine a story to fabricate that would stir the GOP troops.

    Publishing this blog, and Bart's ought to be enough to scandalize any thinking person, and they don't have graphs or even a didactic edge.

    I wish Obama had published several 10- point lists of how the health care bill helps ordinary people as well as explaning how it helps the economy. I wish some attempt had been made to educate people on the basics. Call me an elitist, but if your idea of "effective" precludes also doing what is right, then go ahead and call me names.


    Call you names?  CVille, I wouldn't do that.  I'm a Wahoo.

    And it's not a zero sum game.  I'm am merely observing that for most people voting is not an intellectual exercise.  The Recons have been successful because they have exploited a gut issue for many different groups:  Pro-Life, Gun nuts, Fundamentalists, Racists, Neo-Nazis, Chamber of Commerce and of course, the uber-rich.  Pro-lifers may not be racist or anti-tax, but they're going to vote that one issue.  And so it goes.

    Dems struggle to hold on to what should be their core constituency:  the working class.


    The Democrats use to use gut issues and quite effectively. But since the early 70s they have been trying to use head issues and have been loosing ever since.

    There is a message there somewhere, I think.Wink


    TJ,

    I'd rather be both, and they can. This is not an either-or situation. You simply use different approaches for different audiences. Whenever a politician tries to circumvent my brain by appealling to my emotions, I not only become insulted, but distrustful of that politician.


    CVille...these are the people who will make you life a living hell if you do not reach them. And you cannot reach them with a bunch of dry, sick in the throat gram-cracker facts. They will just ignore them.

    You have to use images and one or two simple items. Like a snipit of some black being beaten in the 1950s and one now and a voice over that that says. The republican party wants the US to go back to the way things were.

    That is the kind of thing that will sell the brand.

     


    And if you don't like those how about these.

    Images of people struggling in the depression of the 1930s then images of people homeless now with the same message. The republican party wants the US to go back to the way things were.

    or

    Images of Chernobyl and now of the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant with the following message. _______  believes that nuclear power needs to be utilized even more. He believes it so much he is willing to bet your life on it.


    CVille,

    Perfectly stated.


    Thank you. I was beginning to think I'd landed in a parallel universe.

     cmaukonen,

    I completely agree that the Democrats need better messaging, but I don't agree that knowledge and a respect for intelligence constitutes elitism.  That attitude is a result of corporate brainwashing.  They want us to think that the pursuit of knowledge is wimpish, and that as Americans we have a moral obligation to be stupid. That's how they keep us under thumb.


    I do not believe that the pursuit of knowledge is elitism either. But what I believe - or you or startdust - is not the point. The point is that people who will vote for these right wing clowns do. So  the message and most importantly the media has to influence them.


    almost everything you say is, sadly, both unassailable and important. I do not agree with the elitism mime; I am all for really smart people in government.  Nor do I see the President as principally at fault.  He is faced with an opposition that few, if any, before him have.  President Roosevelt was elected with huge Democratic majorities.  (Of course, that included southern Democrats who are now called Republicans, and, when they got heir second win in 1938 they started undermining the President the same way as is happening today---and with a hostile Supreme Court.)

    My main concern with the president is his desire to find common ground with people who do not want to do the same with him.  According to Remnick's book, this is the way the man has lived his adult life and, Huckabee and his cohorts aside, part of that probably has to do with growing up in Hawaii---a place which I imagine as something close to heaven as we can get on this earth.  It is not Harlem, in any event, which he saw for a few years while in college.

    On the other hand, this president is just black enough to bring out an opposition which has left reason in the dust---it is something I wrote about on this site yesterday.  That has allowed what is happening.  It is scary, to say the least.

     


    I remember reading somewhere lately where when asked why labor was not voting entirely democratic that the answer was that they had become too successful.

    I think that misses a major point. Racist and bigoted attitudes were and still are very prevalent in the North. Not just as belligerent as the the South.  This has to be taken into account. There are whites in the north who resented the civil rights acts and so called entitlements as much as - if not more than - the those in the southern states.

    So when you look at the right wing it is a profound mistake to think ONLY of the south in terms of racial animosity and resentment.

     


    It does not surprise me in the least that Obama is not saying or doing anything about the assault on labor. That is not his background. His background is upper middle class with his mother a college professor. He could no more relate to labor than I could to Donald Trump.

    Unfortunately that goes for the majority of people in Washington these days.


    Eric,

    I think you are too forgiving.  Your take is that Obama is just too nice and agreeable, with a compromising demeanor, and that he somehow doesn't fully understand what the Republicans are up to.  I think you are underestimating Obama's intelligence and canniness, and overlooking his massive, cynical ambition and ego.

    The reason Obama has done nothing of note to address historically high rates of unemployment, and barely even alluded during his State of the Union speech to the huge unemployment problem staring the whole country in the face, is that he just really doesn't care too much about unemployed people.  Unemployed people seem to disgust him - just as he is disgusted by icky oil washing up on our beaches, oil that he didn't want to go near or touch - physically or politically.  He's a successful self-made man, and doesn't really like the dirty and poorly-dressed unemployed rabble.

    The reason he is empowering the deficit hawks, and those with an agenda of shrinking progressive government and undoing the working class and middle class protections erected by previous generations of progressive Democrats isn't naivete.  He's on the deficit hawks' anti-progressive side.  He <i>appointed</i> the deficit reduction commission - a stacked deck of deficit hawks chaired by one of the most conservative Democrats in the United States and a brainless Republican cowboy.  That commission set the parameters for the current debate in which the progressive position doesn't even have a seat at the table.

    Obama seems to place great confidence in his Treasury Secretary, a man straight out of the Greenspan, Rubin, Summers school of neoliberal market fundamentalism. Geithner is busy now trying to undermine the Dodd-Frank financial regulations.

    Obama elevated Jeffrey Immelt to be Chair of the President's Council of Jobs and competitiveness.  Yet Immelt is famously a <i>major proponent</i> of outsourcing.  This is the man who now in charge of creating <i>jobs</i> in the US.

    Obama is no babe in the woods.  He has made a choice to align himself with the people who have made America a middle-class destroying playground for the rich, but who can help Obama buy a re-election victory.   Obama appaerently hates the traditional Democratic Party and everything it stands for.  He thinks its beneath him.  He thinks he's smarter and more special than we are.  You can read it on his face and in his body language, as well as see it in his policies.

    Barack Obama is an opportunistic and obsequious man who is driven by a need to impress his social superiors and earn the confidence of elites, and who has shown a consistent pattern of disposing of old allies, and humiliating and disparaging them, once they no longer serve his ambitions.  It's no coincidence that "throw under the bus" became such a popular expression over the past three years with particular reference to Obama.  What's happening to American workers, American government employees and the American middle class now is only what has happened to a whole parade of other used and disposed-of folks before.

    A recent poll showed that despite the huge rate of unemployment among black Americans, almost every single one of them is planning to vote for Barack Obama in 2012.  Apparently, they think the President of the United States is a relatively powerless figure, and that every single bad thing that has happened on Obama's watch is someone else's fault.  So Obama has probably concluded that he has black Americans in the bag.  They are his re-election guarantee trump card, which means he has absolutely zero incentive to move toward the progressive direction in 2012.  He has hard-core loyalists who will vote for him no matter what he does.


    This was written by me, Dan Kervick.  I forgot to sign in before posting.


    Barack Obama is an opportunistic and obsequious man who is driven by a need to impress his social superiors and earn the confidence of elites, and who has shown a consistent pattern of disposing of old allies, and humiliating and disparaging them, once they no longer serve his ambitions.  It's no coincidence that "throw under the bus" became such a popular expression over the past three years with particular reference to Obama.  What's happening to American workers, American government employees and the American middle class now is only what has happened to a whole parade of other used and disposed-of folks before.

    Unfortunately he is not alone in this. He has a lot of company on both sides of the isle and in those who support him.


    Wow, that is some piece you've written here. But most disturbing is this little missive:

    Barack Obama is an opportunistic and obsequious man who is driven by a need to impress his social superiors and earn the confidence of elites, and who has shown a consistent pattern of disposing of old allies, and humiliating and disparaging them, once they no longer serve his ambitions.

    What?  Did you just call the President an Uncle Tom?

    I'll will see your  accusation that the President is nothing more than an Uncle Tom and raise you one Ralph Ellison:

    Live with your head in the lion’s mouth. I want you to overcome ‘em with yeses, undermine ‘em with grins, agree ‘em to death and destruction, let ‘em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open..."

    And this one:

    "I was never more hated than when I tried to be honest. Or when, even as just now I've tried to articulate exactly what I felt to be the truth. No one was satisfied"

    He truly is an Invisible man to so many people.


    Coincidentally, I ran across Smiley and West's radio show for the first time this evening, while driving back to the city. They were interviewing AFL-CIO Prez Richard Trumka, talking about the Day of Solidarity (April 4th) and asking him why Obama wasn't pushing harder on union concerns. 


    Latest Comments