MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
To represent a picture of both sides, the NYTimes has published two guest op-eds. This is the first. I'll put the second in a comment
De Blasio’s Plan for NYC Schools Isn’t Anti-Asian. It’s Anti-Racist.
It gives a diverse group of working-class kids a fairer shot, which shouldn’t be controversial.
By Minh-Ha T. Pham, June 13
Ms. Pham is a scholar of Asian-American studies whose child attends New York City public schools.
Comments
Here's the other op-ed:
No Ethnic Group Owns Stuyvesant. All New Yorkers Do.
Mayor Bill de Blasio’s plan would destroy the best high schools in New York City.
By Boaz Weinstein, June 13
Mr. Weinstein is a graduate of Stuyvesant High School and is on the board of its alumni association.
Illustrated with a picture of a recent protest, gives you an idea of the heat surrounding this:
by artappraiser on Wed, 06/13/2018 - 9:55pm
My wife and I were just debating this over dinner. One thought that struck me, which neither piece mentions, is the effect on the middle schools. Currently, many NYC parents are desperate to put their kids on the right track--get into an elite elementary school to get into an elite middle school to get into an elite high school. But what if attending an elite middle school wasn't the best path to an elite middle high school? Under De Blasio's more ambitious plan, it might be more effective to aim for the top 7 percent at a weaker middle school in order to get into an elite high school. That could have the effect of diversifying the middle schools, which would be a good thing.
by Michael Wolraich on Wed, 06/13/2018 - 11:33pm
I liked, because: "outside the box"
The Complex Disadvantages Underlying New York City’s Specialized-High-School Dilemma
By Andrew Boryga @ NewsDesk @ NewYorker.com, June 15, 2018
I am reminded of a conversation with a Manhattan white shoe lawyer, a fellow boomer, who also tries to keep up with how youngins these days are thinking, also a practicing conservative NY area Jew since childhood, so experienced the specific local upper class prejudices of the era. Vis-a-vis, precisely: the whole Ivy League wanna be thing, will get you everything you want in life. We started by remarking on how many men we know of our age who are working themselves to death to pay those Ivy League tuitions. And how they've been on a hamster wheel since their kids were little trying to get them there. And for: what exactly? Is it not that not just jobs are changing, but the whole nature of work? And that the next generation does not at all see things the same way the last several did? And how nobody in the big money tech world gives a damn about anyone going to Hahvad or Yale or Brown? And how nobody gives a damn about Muffy and Buffy of Park Avenue and Palm Beach anymore? They are toast, their world is dying. So why, again, is everyone fighting so hard to get into Ivy League and then pay for it? Who is gonna care? It's like that commercial jingle: we want something else!
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/16/2018 - 2:59am
I'm not at all impressed with the quality of this student op-ed, but the NYDaily News photograph illustrating it is worth a thousand words and certainly fodder for those who might have racist thoughts about Asian-Americans:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/01/2019 - 9:11am