T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
So apparently, the U.S. Postal Service is in a peck of trouble. Despite raising postage fees numerous times during the past couple of years, the USPS announced earlier this week that it had lost $2.4 billion between April and June and would be $7 billion in debt by the end of September.
Are you kidding me? $2.4 billion in losses in 3 months?? Are you sure the USPS isn't making cars or selling subprime mortgages?
I know the economy is tough, and more and more people are communicating digitally nowadays, but there's no excuse for this kind of performance. FedEx and UPS are still making money, after all.
If the USPS was a normal private company, changes would be made pronto to get its fiscal house in order. But because we're talking about the government here, our lovely elected officials can seemingly do nothing but berate Postmaster General John Potter for the agency's performance while hemming and hawing over the implementation of some of the common sense changes he's asking for - like the elimination of Saturday service, closure of hundreds of offices, and changes in retiree pay. Even certain Republicans - like Missouri congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson - are worried about cutting back too much. They've got constituents to think about, after all.
Of course, the postal worker union thinks Congress is already going too far and 'declaring war' on their kind. I've known a couple of people who work for the postal office and like most government workers, they have some of the most secure, cushy jobs out there. Anything that threatens the status quo is anathema to the postal union.
In the end, however, the union will probably have to accept certain changes, like the end of Saturday delivery. Meanwhile, I wonder if we even need residential five-day delivery anymore? Why doesn't the USPS do like the garbage folks and stop by two or three days a week. I know that 90-plus percent of the mail I get nowadays is either junk or not particularly time-sensitive. The rare items that I want to get as soon as possible - Netflix movies, magazines - could probably be delivered through one of the private couriers.
Don't get me wrong. In many ways, I'm impressed by how well the postal service works. Sure, going to the post office and getting service is a nightmare, but when you think about the millions of pieces of mail that get delivered on time and to the right address every day, it's a remarkable system, actually.
In fact, when people have complained that a government-run health care plan would wind up being a total disaster, the USPS was one of the examples I often gave of government doing a big job pretty effectively.
Unfortunately, I'm not so sure anymore. Perhaps the naysayers have a point.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
As you note, it's a remarkable system. It's also one that can be salvaged. Even from your own re-telling here, it sounds like we would be better off without a Congress than without a postal service. Okay, I only half-way mean that.
To extend your example of the USPS as a functional government apparatus, there's another way in which it serves as a counter-argument to opponents of healthcare reform. Namely, reform opponents claim that health insurance companies couldn't compete with a government-run system. Clearly this is not the case with the USPS and private carriers like UPS and FedEx.
Of course, the reality is that a government-run healthcare system would actually force competition where there presently isn't any. So, in reality, the truth is that they would have to compete, not that they couldn't.
But, hey.. I live in a country where geriatric, flag-waving Medicare recipients shout, "Socialism!! BOO!!!"
The old Post Office in downtown Chicago is for sale for $300k. Maybe eBay or Amazon can buy it and turn it into an amusement park.