T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
Gather round, children, and I will tell you the story of Chanukkah (which I brazenly lifted from the internet).
Long ago in the land of Judea there was a Syrian king, Antiochus. The king ordered the Jewish people to reject their God, their religion, their customs and their beliefs and to worship the Greek gods. There were some who did as they were told, but many refused. One who refused was Judah Maccabee.
Judah and his four brothers formed an army and chose as their name the word "Maccabee", which means hammer. After three years of fighting, the Maccabees were finally successful in driving the Syrians out of Israel and reclaimed the Temple in Jerusalem. The Maccabees wanted to clean the building and to remove the hated Greek symbols and statues. On the 25th day of the month of Kislev, the job was finished and the temple was rededicated.
When Judah and his followers finished cleaning the temple, they wanted to light the eternal light, known as the N'er Tamid, which is present in every Jewish house of worship. Once lit, the oil lamp should never be extinguished.
Only a tiny jug of oil was found with only enough for a single day. The oil lamp was filled and lit. Then a miracle occurred as the tiny amount of oil stayed lit not for one day, but for eight days.
Gather round, adults, and I will tell you what really happened (as best we know)...
In 334 B.C.E., Alexander the Great conquered Judea along with rest of the Middle East. His reign was notable for religious tolerance, though he imported Hellenistic practices to the lands he conquered and offered tax breaks to grecophones. After Alexander died without an obvious successor, his generals squabbled over the empire and ultimately broke it into three parts. One of the generals, Seleucus, won control of the westernmost part, which stretched from Turkey to India and became known as the Seleucid Empire.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes was the eighth ruler of the empire. He initially continued Alexander's practices of religious tolerance and Hellenist influence, which many Judeans embraced enthusiastically. From the first Book of Maccabees:
At that time there were some evil-doers in Israel who tried to win popularity for a policy of integration with the surrounding nations. It was because the Jews had kept themselves aloof for so long, they claimed, that so many hardships had befallen them. They acquired a following and applied to Antiochus, who authorized them to introduce the Greek way of life. They built a Greek gymnasium in Jerusalem and even had themselves uncircumcised.
The conflict between grecophiles and traditionalists was suffused with political intrigue. When the High Priest died in 175 B.C.E, his pro-Greek son Jason bribed Antiochus to be made High Priest in place of his anti-Greek brother, Onias. Then Menelaus, another grecophile who wasn't even a member of the High-priestly family, bribed Antiochus to replace Jason. When Antiochus left to invade Egypt, Jason took advantage of the opportunity to forcibly win back his position. Upon returning from the semi-successful Egyptian campaign, Antiochus interpreted Jason's move as an insurrection. That's when he outlawed Jewish religious practices and slaughtered those who resisted.
According to the Book of Maccabees, Mattathias, the leader of a conservative priestly clan known as the Hasmoneans, refused to make an offering to Greek gods as commanded by a Greek official. When another Judean attempted to make an offering on his behalf, Mattathias killed him, along with the Greek official, and fled with his five sons to the mountains. His son, Judah, adopted the nom de guerre of Judah Maccabee and launched a holy war against Antiochus, employing guerrilla tactics to defeat the larger Greek-Syrian army. After winning Judean independence, the Hasmonians established a religious dynasty which survived until the Romans interceded and placed Herod on the throne.
As for the miracle of the oil, the first Book of the Maccabees doesn't even mention it.
Some Chanukkah trivia for you:
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
The grecophiles "even had themselves uncircumcized?"
Forget that stuff about the oil; there's your real miracle.
Please don't use the expression 'goyim' for gentiles. It's potentially as offensive as 'nigger'.
From Wikipedia:
So it's offensive only to the uneducated.
No, you have it wrong. It's offensive to non-jews. Do you like non-jews calling you kikes?
Who are you to be labelling other people?
I'm Genghis
I like that turn of phrase, "potentially as offensive as." Really, what label is not "potentially as offensive as 'nigger'?" Take a label, add a pejorative connotation, sprinkle in a few centuries of oppression and degradation, and voila, instant radical offensiveness. Just the other day, Orlando was complaining about an Iraqi spokesperson who said of the shoe-thrower, "He cried like a woman" (while he was getting the shit kicked out out of him). So there you go. The guy used the word "woman" pejoratively, we've already got the centuries, nay millenia of oppression and degradation. I hereby declare "woman" to be as "potentially as offensive as 'nigger'," and I forbid anyone from using it on this site. Orlando may use it among her female friends, but if anyone who is not a female person uses it on this site to refer to people of the opposite gender, I will ask someone to scrub it from the record.
For the curious viewing audience, goy is a Hebrew word for nation, and the Bible actually uses the term to refer to the Jewish people. But over time, the connotation has changed, so that in Hebrew and Yiddish, goy essentially means gentile or gentile nation, as GeoffreyKzhn notes in the prior comment. Goyim is the plural form.
But some argue that when used by English speakers, goy can have negative connotations and is therefore as potentially as offensive as "nigger." Alan Dershowitz, in one of his many books, The Vanishing American Jew, offers up a particularly odious example: "In the 1985 film The Last Dragon, billed as a kung-fu comedy, some of the action takes place in a noodle factory named 'Sum Dum Goy'." Shocking, no? That's like a Chinese slur and a gentile slur all rolled up into a giant stinking potentially as offensive as "nigger" ball of political incorrectness. It's a shande!
So to all my gentile friends and readers and other passerby, please accept my heartfelt apology. I did not mean to refer to you perjoratively. Whenever I think of you non-Jews, I feel all happy and tingly inside. I love you goys!
Stop whining. You sound like a girl.
I got a goiter for Channukah.
Thanks Ma.
So this is pretty fascinating. Our new friend, Jorn Barger, is the guy who coined the term weblog, or else he's spoofing the guy who created the term weblog. But the link in his username does go to Barger's blog, and Barger has a history of antisemitism. If you google "Jorn Barger goyim", you'll see that this guy has been going around offering variations of the same comment on other blogs that use the term, goy. I plan to write a full post on this later.
Barger does seem oddly fixated on the word, even objecting to a blogger who announced, "Merry Christmas to my goyim friends and readers." What an unpardonable slur!
Blogging can range from coolly reasoned and third-person to informal, personal, even intimate. Dagblog trends toward the latter. I read your headline as shorthand for, "I'm Jewish, you're probably not, but I have something to tell you from that perspective." Cramming lots of data into a five-letter word. (As do most borrowings that gained some currency in English: shiksa, mensch, yenta. Why five letters? I dunno.)
Could goy or goyim be "potentially offensive?" Sure, in an inappropriate context, like a serious discussion of the Gaza crisis. If I hit that word there, I would read it as, "OK, non-Jews, you can stop reading now. I'm not talking to you any more."
Still, despite Barger's claim, you'd have to surround the word with lots of pejoratives for it to come even remotely close to being as offensive as the unadorned word "nigger." I have some sympathy with rappers who have tried to take possession and rehabilitate that word, but unless Obama himself starts using it, I don't think it'll make into the mainstream. Of course, I didn't give "queer" much chance either, and it has battled its way back to quasi-respectability.
Finally, this whole digression was worth it just for the line, "I love you goys."
Thanks I loved this page. The comments I'm not sure about. I too consider the term goyium as offensive. Not as offensive as the "N" word but still offensive enough. If I am really your friend how come the connotation? I like to say hello to my friends? no, my GOYIUM friends. Which could be seen similar to someone saying. I like to say hi to my BLACK friends. Why not just friends? Do you refer to people that don't have an understanding of your job with a word as well? If so is it a derogitory term?
I have no doubt that the OP meant it in the best possible way . I'm just saying it elicits the same response that I would get if I refered to you as Pagan. You probably would have no problem with the word but might be bothered that I keep refering to you with that label. As if that label says all I need to know about you to make a judgement.
acanuck - The word is offensive because it is used that way. If I called a jewish person a goy they would not only correct me they would be deeply offended. Why? because of the way it is used and understood inside jewish culture. same way I would be offended if I was called a pagan all the time by my Christian friends. Not because of the word itself but because of what it means to person using it. Unfortuantely as the rappers found out. You can't use a label or word a certain way and expect the way it was used and still is used in some parts to be forgotten or void of its intently negative connotation.
That said. I think it was appropiately used in this article. It is obviously an article for people that don't understand the meaning and celebration of the jewish holiday so it appropiately is addressing the "non-jewish" reader. I wouldn't be offended in this instance as it seems a proper use of the term. However, this not how I hear it used most of the time. Thanks for the information and best wishes for us all.