cmaukonen's picture

    In an Unusual Moment of Clarity - Michele Bachmann Gets it Right Once

    They say the even crazy people can be right at lease once and this time it has been our darling crazy, Michele Bachmann.

    Ms. Bachmann voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) "both times," she boasts, and she has no regrets since Congress "just gave the Treasury a $700 billion blank check." She complains that no one bothered to ask about the constitutionality of these extraordinary interventions into the financial markets. "During a recent hearing I asked Secretary [Timothy] Geithner three times where the constitution authorized the Treasury's actions, and his response was, 'Well, Congress passed the law.'" Insufficient focus on constitutional limits to federal power is a Bachmann pet peeve. "It's like when you come up to a stop sign and you're driving. Some people have it in their mind that the stop sign is optional. The Constitution is government's stop sign. It says, you--the three branches of government--can go so far and no farther. With TARP, the government blew through the Constitutional stop sign and decided 'Whatever it takes, that's what we're going to do.'" Does this mean she would have favored allowing the banks to fail? "I would have. People think when you have a, quote, 'bank failure,' that that is the end of the bank. And it isn't necessarily. A normal way that the American free market system has worked is that we have a process of unwinding. It's called bankruptcy. It doesn't mean, necessarily, that the industry is eclipsed or that it's gone. Often times, the phoenix rises out of the ashes."

    It became apparent that the main reason for TARP was NOT to save our banks, per se' but to save those of Europe or more specifically the European Union.

    A congressional watchdog criticized, Thursday, the US government's handling of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which was set up as a $700 billion rescue fund for ailing local financial firms in 2008, saying it aided banks in foreign countries more than rescue programs of other countries helped US businesses. The Congressional Oversight Panel accused, Thursday, the US Treasury of mishandling TARP money, saying that foreign banks received far more help from the US rescue effort than local financial firms did. The panel cited, for instance, the rescue case of troubled insurer American International Group (AIG). Even as the US government "bore the entire $70 billion risk of the AIG capital injection program," banks in France and Germany turned out to be the biggest beneficiaries, the panel said.

    But this will not succeed any more than it did here as we watch EU member states fold under weight of the debt incurred by their own financial follies and the greed and opportunism of the self same banks. TARP did not then save the economy but rather postponed the consequences of the laissez-faire economics of the last 3 decades. I do not agree with anything else that either Bachmann or any of there other Teabagging right wing comes up with. In this one case though, her assessment is pretty much spot one. But then it is also said that an infinite number on monkeys will eventually come up with a script to Desperate Housewives.  

    Comments

    Pssssst.  (Y a might wanna try 'Clarity'...)  (Read later)


    "TOO BIG TO FAIL"   is the movie an accurate event?

    Have you had a chanced to see the Movie on HBO  "TOO BIG TO FAIL"

    I wish we could discuss that movie, but I was told not to ruin it for others who hadn't seen it yet.

    That was about a 30 days  ago

    In the movie, Barclay's screwed up the works.

    I have had friends tell me, Congress couldn't directly help the homeowners because the law did not provide for it, but you're  telling me Congress made a law to help the banks, but couldnt pass a law to help the people?

    In the movie the character playing Barney Frank asked about the people.

    When McCain cancelled his Presidential campaign to go back to DC, he threw a monket wrench into the works.

    It feel upon Pelosi and the Democrats to sell the Bailout.

    Is the Movie "TOO BIG TO FAIL"  An accurate account?  

     


    "TOO BIG TO FAIL" == "TOO BIG TO CONTINUE"


    I do not have cable. I choose to spend my money of more worth while items.


    I made a choice, either I only feed myself on the skim milk, the MSM gives as news,  or I  pay for the meatier pieces.

    Being armed with the proper equipment costs money.  


    Apart from the question of whether TARP was smart policy or a corrupt giveaway, what basis is there for thinking it was unconstitutional?  There is no basis at all.  Zero.

    Michele Bachman is a crazy right-wing ultra-small government wingnut who thinks the constitution implicitly prohibits just about everything.  Progressives shouldn't be giving her props for defending a constitutional philosophy which would stand in the way of just about every piece progressive economic legilation that has ever been passed.

    There is nothing in the constitution that says to the legislative branch, "Thou shalt not pass bad laws."

     

     


    Latest Comments