Destor on Ordering a Pizza Conservatively in Texas
Ramona: Hatred in a Lovely Church
Gallup: Obama 46, Romney 46
|
Destor on Ordering a Pizza Conservatively in Texas Ramona: Hatred in a Lovely Church Gallup: Obama 46, Romney 46 |
Read |
But did you catch this?
When the President described the tax cuts that the middle class could count on, he said, "Not only the Bush tax cuts, but" also the ones from last year. (that last phrase is not a direct quote, but it paraphrases his statement)
Is there any reason in anyone's thinking that he could not utter the words, "The Obama tax cuts?"
Anyone?
Seriously, I hope enough Democrats walk away from this to doom it.
The issue of sexual assaults on American Indian women has become one of the major sources of discord in the current debate between the White House and the House of Representatives over the latest reauthorization of the landmark Violence Against Women Act of 1994.
.......
“We should never have a woman come into the office saying, ‘I need to learn more about Plan B for when my daughter gets raped,’ ” said Charon Asetoyer, a women’s health advocate on the Yankton Sioux Reservation in South Dakota, referring to the morning-after pill. “That’s what’s so frightening — that it’s more expected than unexpected. It has become a norm for young women.”
The difficulties facing American Indian women who have been raped are myriad, and include a shortage of sexual assault kits at Indian Health Service hospitals, where there is also a lack of access to birth control and sexually transmitted disease testing. There are also too few nurses trained to perform rape examinations, which are generally necessary to bring cases to trial.
By Ismail Kahn, New York Times, May 23/24, 2012
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — A Pakistani doctor who helped the Central Intelligence Agency pin down Osama bin Laden's location under cover of a vaccination drive was convicted on Wednesday of treason and sentenced to 33 years in prison, a senior official in Pakistan said.
A tribal court here in northwestern Pakistan found the doctor, Shakil Afridi, guilty of acting against the state, said Mutahir Zeb Khan, the administrator for the Khyber tribal region [....]
By Sergei L. Loiko, Los Angeles Times, May 23, 2012
MOSCOW — Stiff new penalties aimed at opposition protesters were given preliminary approval Tuesday by Russian lawmakers loyal to President Vladimir Putin, the target of mass rallies and demonstrations before his March election victory.
The bill, which opposition parliament members termed draconian and protested by threatening to file out of a legislative session, calls for fines of up to $50,000 and up to 200 hours of community service for organizers of rallies and demonstrations that grow violent or exceed the approved number of participants.
The sanctions were approved on first reading by parliament's lower house, which is controlled by Putin's United Russia party. They mark a return by the Kremlin to a tough stance against critics after concessions during the recent election campaign [...]
Also see:
Russians back Putin, strong leadership
Washington Post, May 22, 2012
A Pew survey of 1,000 Russians found that President Vladimir Putin is well-liked by more than 70 percent of citizens, especially older adults.
Associated Press, May 21, 2012
HAVANA — It was all sunshine, smiles and celebratory speeches as officials marked the arrival of an undersea fiber-optic cable they promised would end Cuba's Internet isolation and boost web capacity 3,000-fold. Even a retired Fidel Castro had hailed the dawn of a new cyber-age on the island.
More than a year after the February 2011 ceremony on Siboney Beach in eastern Cuba, and 10 months after the system was supposed to have gone online, the government never mentions the cable anymore, and Internet here remains the slowest in the hemisphere. People talk quietly about embezzlement torpedoing the project and the arrest of more than a half-dozen senior telecom officials.
Perhaps most maddening, nobody has explained what happened to the much-ballyhooed $70 million project....
By Tamasin Ford in Monrovia, Guardian.co.uk, May 22, 2012
Husbands, not strangers or men with guns, are now the biggest threat to women in post-conflict west Africa, according to a report by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) released on Tuesday.
The IRC report, Let Me Not Die Before My Time: Domestic Violence in West Africa, based on data collected over 10 years by the IRC in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Ivory Coast, said domestic violence is the "most urgent, pervasive and significant protection issue for women in west Africa" [.....]
Could the House nuke it? Don't know the math, really...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/05/tax-cuts-house-senate-democrats-deal_n_792258.html
By the way, CVille, I think we're using the word 'yielded' now, instead of 'caved'. It sounds so much more bipartisan, and allows Obama to be seen as a victim of political realities instead of a mmm...er...uh...
Stardust: Thanks for the update! I remember when I told my daughter I learned a new word, and it was "BLING." She laughed so hard because I was so behind the times! Keep working on keeping me topical!! ---OOOR, Tropical -- geez, I need a vacation!
That's def.
LOL! Had to Urban-dictionary def; 'cool, kewl, dope, ya know; as in:
2 percentage point cut on the payroll tax which is great if it's on the employee side and crap if it's on the employer side. But if it falls to the bottom line of working Americans then it's the raise they didn't get this year.
13 months extension of unemployment. That's good news.
Oh and 2 points off everyone's SSI payments is probably worth a lot more than the expiring Making Work Pay tax credit which maxed out at $400 per year, which is a pittance.
I'm watching Hardball. Did he REALLY need to do this? I swear, if he called the repub's bluff, I think it would have worked well for all of us. Everyone was predicting all along that he would give in to the repub's demands; if he had done the unexpected it would have increased his power. He did the predictable, and predicted; and therefore, ho, hum... "the republicans are those who must be obeyed," is the message, regardless of unemployment, etc, etc, etc....
I reiterate:
The BUSH tax cuts. Why not the OBAMA tax cuts?
Why not use his bully pulpit to remind people that a tax break for income under $250,000 IS a tax break for EVERYONE? Because everyone gets a break on that level of income. Is there a reason to keep that fact secret? <p>
Blaming the republicans for something no one will feel is futile. His administration will get no credit for preventing it from happening. They should have let everything expire and then introduced over and over and over again, middle-class tax breaks and unemployment extensions and let the republicans take the flak.
Since the current tax cuts aren't sunsetting as they were supposed to BY LAW, who is stupid enough to think they will end in 2 years?
I am really tiring of this poor strategy; and I use that word loosely.
Good point CVille. You're right. Everyone would get that break.
One more link, CVille, without the update on estate taxes. Dayan's been following this.
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/12/06/tax-cut-deal-includes-monstrous-estate-tax-dividend-concession/
p.s. You may want to read my Korean Trade Agreement diary, too. A larger Grrr for me, since this deal's been in the works for a couple weeks, I'm almost used to it, sadly.
I have heard the cost in lost revenue a thousand times from letting tax cuts for the rich stay in place. How much revenue will be lost by extending the middle class tax cuts?
This Boston Globe story says $4 trillion cost for all tax cuts with $700 billion for top 2%. So, $3.3 trillion.
Thanks. I went looking and found somewhat differeny figures and posted them on oleebs blog.
Viewed purely with respect for our need as a stimulus I'm perfectly happy with the deal Obama has made with the Republicans.
Increasing the tax rate on couples earning more that $250K would have added some fractional % to the unemployment rate. Sounds minor unless you were one of the individuals making up that fractional % and you were unable to pay your bills because the democrats were successful in getting those couples to pay more taxes in 2011.
I overuse the phrase , but still believe ' You have to choose the A item'. If for Obama that's getting unemployment down then it is incoherent to impose a tax increase now that will increase unemployment in 2011.
Having made his campaign promise to increase the rate on those over $250Ks consistency pretty much required Obama to keep on repeating himself. But he's not innumerate and he was probably well aware that increase was counter productive right now. The Republicans have bailed him out.
Getting harder to be a dem and remain CVille?
Meanwhile, over at Red State, "caving" is a hot topic, too.
Here's the reader blog that is the latest on the "recent posts" list:
and here's the contributor post at the top of the home page right now: