T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
Roland Burris? I haven't paid much attention to Illinois politics in a while, but when I was still paying attention, Roland Burris, a once respected elected official, had turned into a sad caricature of himself.
Some highlights:
Apparently, he expressed interest in Obama's senate seat early, but wasn't considered seriously. This could possibly be because he's been out of office for 14 years. It could also be because he's an idiot.
Blagojevich could be getting something from Burris. It would be brazenly stupid to sell the senate seat when he's being indicted for attempting to sell the senate seat. But I think it's fairly clear that Blagojevich is not just brazenly stupid, but blazingly so as well.
If he's not getting anything out of it, this move is a gigantic eff you to the Illinois Democratic Party. It's saying, "You want to impeach me? Fine. Here's your Senator, good luck holding on to the seat in 2010."
Blagojevich, classy to the end. What a jackass.
UPDATE: I've been reading what some other people are saying at TPM and Washington Monthly. There are apparently at least some Illinois voters who are suggesting that Burris is ethical and well-liked, and is a great choice. To this I say, pardon me while I barf. Burris is a legend in his own mind and this former Illinois voter has never liked nor respected him. He has run for Senate and Governor and lost repeatedly--meaning those voters who supposedly like and respect him did not vote for him. It's a cheap way for Burris to get what he covets and I think it's a disgusting choice.
UPDATE 2 - 3PM EST: Blagojevich goes ahead and does it. Roland Burris is officially named to fill Obama's senate seat. But Harry Reid says absolutely not and Illinois Attorney General Secretary of State (and crack tumbler) Jesse White has Reid's back. In other news, the circus cancelled it's upcoming Chicago engagement, citing redundancy.
UPDATE 3 - 6PM EST: After searching all day long, I finally found an article that appears to agree with my analysis of Roland Burris. Also, you can watch the incredibly weird press conference online now:
UPDATE 5 (Last one, I promise): Obama agrees with me. Okay, not really. But he agrees with Harry Reid.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
That Senate seat was supposed to MINE! I'm demanding my $10 back from Blago.
Sigh. New York is now my only shot. It's a good thing that Kennedy imploded her candidacy. I assure you that when I do my introductory tour, no one will accuse me of trading on my name. Maybe I can get four of five rent-controlled apartments out of it, like Chuck Rangel.
It's great to finally have a political party with moral standards in power, no?
A thought has just occurred to me. Blago is probably gonna be bored in prison. Plus, he'll need some income. Why don't you let him keep the $10 if he agrees to guest blog at Dag. We're a little too ethical around here. We need some cheapening.
Blago seems not to be as stupid as he looks. He's got the lawyer for RKelly defending him, he of the Shaggy "It Wasn't Me", "Little Man" defense despite videotape evidence. http://www.slate.com/id/2191876/entry/2191877/
Unless they have really solid evidence of someone trying to purchase the seat on JJJ's behalf (Candidate 5) - in which case Blago is not going down alone - they may not have enough evidence to impeach him, much less convict him. It's pretty hard to get someone on trying to sell something that was ultimately not sold, which is why the timing of the takedown was so strange to me. Why not let the seat be sold so you can nab both the buyer and the seller (and anyone who was willing to play along)?
He's appointing someone who was outside of the cool list discussed with Rahm, but it's someone Obama endorsed for Governor himself. Damn it I was hoping for Senator Oprah! She'd make C-Span hearings more entertaining (You get a car! And Code Pink gets a car!). Oprah's much more deserving of a Senator seat than Caroline Kennedy and had a bigger role to play in getting Obama elected.
Obama really endorsed Burris for governor? Well, congratulations, Dija. You've finally found something that causes me to lose a tiny bit of respect for Obama.
Unless he did it because he had Blagojevich's number before the rest of us.
Sadly, I doubt that was the case.
In that case, I'm demanding my $10 back from Obama as well. It used to be that you could trust elected officials to keep their promises.