T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
With all respect to my friend and fellow dagblogger Genghis, I must respectfully disagree. I'd leave a comment in his thread, but my comment is too long and we've had issues recently where Genghis is intemperately editing comments in "his" threads, so to avoid any disagreements of those sorts, I will make this as clear as I can in a separate blog entry: Glenn Beck doesn't matter, and the progressive community's unhealthy obsession with him is a destructive distraction from Things That Do Matter. Here's why:
First, there is always going to be a political opposition. FOX News is a major cluster of the opposition to the President. Now, I like and admire the President. But the natural course of things is that there will be media outlets opposed to the party and President in power. Through his increasing unpopularity, George W. Bush promoted MSNBC more than MSNBC could have promoted itself otherwise. And with Democrats in control of both the Presidency and Congress, it is the natural order of things that there will be an uptick in attention to political media that focus upon criticizing the party in power. People who suggest that Beck and those who espouse his consistently antiprogressive views must be stamped out or silenced remind me of defense lawyers who wish the plaintiff's bar did not exist. Without plaintiffs, what cases would there be to defend? There will always be two sides in our great arguments. And also, some people who bring discredit upon each side in all of our great arguments...
Second, Glenn Beck does not bring credit upon the conservative cause he purports to promote. He says a lot of stupid things that are a discredit to him and make reasonable people ignore him. He's deservedly infamous for saying that President Obama is a racist with "deep seated hatred for white people or the white culture." (Actually, Glenn, he's half white! And was closer in his premarital life to his white mom than anyone.) Earth to jerk: President Obama is not a racist, and is staunchly antiracist. Most Americans get this. Many of his former sponsors get this: Beck's been dropped by GEICO, lawyers.com, Progressive, ConAgra, and Procter and Gamble, who weren't ok with the way Beck chose to slur the President. The people who show up to listen to the ranting of a man who says things like that about the President are going to show up. There is no point making a daily event out of the fact of their showing up. And don't get me started on how Beck can't even spell oligarch, and doesn't know what it means.
Third, it takes two to make the current echo chamber in our fractionated media. We have Olbermann, who each night explains that O'Reilly, Beck, Limbaugh, and [rotating fourth person among Michelle Bachmann, Michael Steele, or actually someone not ordinarily mentioned] are the Worst Persons in the World. Beck and Limbaugh in particular do the same thing back, jeering the President and his supporters in the same hateful, antidialogic way Olbermann does. I say they are all debasing our political culture. As the aphorism goes, and as one sees in legal practice with lawyers who live to attack meanly, you shouldn't wrestle with a pig. It just gets you muddy, and the pig likes it. So let's not wrestle pigs. Or be them. Ok?
Fourth, rolling these points together: generalized advocacy and opposition that devolves to cheerleading for the left or right is not valuable discussion. MSNBC's Keith and Ed, and FOX's evening lineup, exist to affirm belief systems in those who don't really need affirmation, and seldom do anything truly interesting with issues of the day. These commentators and their core audiences know what they think and how they'll vote. So why waste one's daily or weekly political thinking, viewing, or listening time on such repetition?
Here's my problem: I hear so much more about Beck than immigration, EFCA, the judiciary, Waxman-Markey, really, name your bill or issue. There's a limited amount of time to think about our politics, and the left is spending it shocked and aghast that the right has often-abrasive, thoughtless cheerleaders (surprise, just as the left does). I am sick of the focus on these cheerleader people, and sick of their focus on each other. Immigration is interesting. EFCA is interesting. Tort reform is interesting. The judiciary is interesting. Climate change is interesting. Fuel standards for cars and energy independence are interesting.
Glenn Beck is not interesting. And other than health care, all our political media can talk about right now is Glenn Beck. As his namesake pop singer, Beck, sang of himself, he's a loser, baby. Let's talk about something more serious, something that matters more, and that can change minds or lives. Now that would be interesting. That would matter.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.