Book of the Month

Articleman's picture

13 Days Left: Obama Surging in October 24 Polling Data

Today was undoubtedly a good day for President Obama.  Both national and state polls suggested that he gained as a result of his debate win on Monday, state polls showed that Mitt Romney's electoral path is narrowing, and the national political story of the day impliedly aids President Obama.  Here's an analysis of the day's data.

National Polls Show Movement Toward Obama

The national polls have been the centerpiece of Rom-mentum.  While state polls have continued to show a modest edge for President Obama, Governor Romney has led in roughly half of national polls in recent weeks, and has at times led in the average of national polls -- most notably taking a seven point lead in the Gallup tracker.  Today's national trackers, however, give some reason for Obama supporters to be optimistic, because even though they remain roughly tied, the trend line is definably one of movement toward Obama.  Gallup has moved from Romney +7 to Romney +3 over three days.  RAND Corporation's tracker has moved from Obama +2 to Obama +4 all on Tuesday.  PPP's daily tracker, which showed Romney +2 three days ago, now shows Obama +1.  IBD/TIPP showed Obama moving from +2 to +3 today.  You get the idea.  There is a mild cautionary note, as PPP notes that President Obama had several strong days after he won the second Presidential debate, with the data lapsing back into a narrow Romney lead over the weekend.  My bottom line is that I think President Obama is moving back ahead nationally, and that judging from the gap between national polls and state polling, the President has a roughly 2% margin below tied nationally within which he would win on November 6.  Today's news thus leaves Mitt Romney in the unenviable position of needing to move the needle 3% nationally in under two weeks.  This is why, despite the narrowness of President Obama's lead, Nate Silver's model has him as 71% likely to win today, a probability that in September one associated with larger leads in national polling -- a narrow lead with 13 days to go is more predictive of victory than a 4 point lead, say, in early September.

Today's State Polls Mostly Good News For Obama

Ohio is most of the ballgame, which made today's polling very good for President Obama.  Time Magazine showed the President leading the Buckeye State by 5 points, and with early voting running 60-30 for him.  SurveyUSA showed President Obama leading by 3 points, the same as last week, and up 2 from 2 weeks ago.  Notably, SUSA reported that 26% of Ohio has now voted, with the President leading among early voters by 20 points.  Finally, Rasmussen, which had reported four consecutive 1 point leads for Obama over six weeks, has now shown a tie.  These polls, taken together, continue to suggest that President Obama is up 2-3 points, and is deploying a ground game that Romney is failing badly to match.  Romney has to win Election Day big in Ohio, and independents are breaking back toward Obama, according to the national polls in the above paragraph (for example, PPP suggests that Romney's lead among them fell from 9 to 2 after his loss in Boca Raton).

Meanwhile, Nevada keeps being a state Mitt Romney should have known better than to contest.  Obama has led by 2-4 points in all 7 polls since October 9, and today pulled a +2 and a +4.  Nevada, as I continue to point out, delivered a margin of 12 points, 5 points above Obama's pre-election polls in 2008 (and I predicted that margin at the time).  Nevada saw Senator Reid overperform polls by 8 in his easy 2010 victory over Sharron Angle.  Democrats enjoy a great registration advantage, and have been early-voting in huge numbers in Clark County.  Barack Obama is going to win Nevada by 6 or more points.

Mitt Romney, meanwhile, pulled a good number in New Hampshire, which is a slightly bigger deal than it appears to be.  Rasmussen reported Romney leading 50-48 there, which is slightly better than the Obama +1 Rasmussen found on October 15.  Two points make me question this number modestly.  First, Rasmussen also found Romney up 3 in midSeptember when every other pollster and common sense indicated he was trailing in New Hampshire.  Second, UNH showed Obama up 9 just before the final debate, and UNH in 2010 was closer to predicting Kelly Ayotte's large margin of victory than any pollster, suggesting accuracy and lack of lean.  Nonetheless, Romney also pulled a +1 from PPP late last week in New Hampshire and a +2 from ARG over the weekend, suggesting that he may lead narrowly there.

Taking today's polls of Ohio, and adding Ohio to the Obama electoral base of 243 EVs I discussed two pieces ago (Nevada is already in that base), President Obama would be at 262 EVs even without considering Wisconsin, Colorado, and Virginia, any one of which could then give him the election.  Put another way, if Obama wins Ohio, Romney has to win Wisconsin, Colorado, Virginia, Florida, and North Carolina.  If Romney holds on in New Hampshire, he could then afford to lose one other swing state -- Iowa, where President Obama appears to lead and appears to be banking an early voting advantage.

Mourdock Comment Likely To Hurt Romney at Least Marginally

Today's top political news was also bad for Romney -- the statement of Indiana Senate candidate and Tea Party favorite Richard Mourdock that in the event of rape followed by pregnancy, he opposes abortion because God intends those rape pregnancies.  There is a good argument that one of the seminal moments in this Presidential election was Todd Akin's "forcible rape" comment.  It crystallized Democratic rhetoric about a supposed "war on women" (really, Democratic shorthand for conservatives raising contraception and abortion as issues in the GOP Presidential primaries) and gave it a noxious face, helping to solidify then-massive gender gaps in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania in favor of President Obama.

In September, much of the margin of President Obama's modest but significant lead was his strong performance among working class white women who identified as moderate or conservative.  This seemed fairly plainly to be a result of Democratic campaigning on women's issues throughout the year, and the positions of a Santorum and the statement of Akin.  Governor Romney did well by seeming calm, reasonable, and faux-centrist in the Denver debate, and with his strong performance reduced the gender gap, as one crucial part of drawing roughly even with the President.

Today?  You can hear it from Romney himself, in the only TV commercial he filmed for any Senate candidate.  He says, "This fall, I'm supporting Richard Mourdock for Senate."  When, predictably, he was asked, Romney clarified that he doesn't want the commercial taken down.  Romney also doesn't rescind the endorsement, which makes sense, because Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan shares Mourdock's position.

Given the legs Akin's comment had, Mourdock's rebranding of the GOP down the stretch in this year's campaign as the party of rape gaffes -- and Romney's association with it, which is already giving rise to pointed attack ads showing Romney and Mourdock speaking and laughing together -- threaten to sustain or modestly increase the gender gap Romney faces in Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, and Iowa.  Without rushing to overstate, if this story has any legs at all during the time when voters are already voting, coupled with Obama's strong debate performances, it threatens to bleed momentum from Romney down the stretch.  Romney trails in all recent polls of Wisconsin, has led in no recent poll of Ohio, and has led very narrowly in Virginia.  Any sharpening of a gender gap at this point is likely to be fatal in all of those states, and in the election overall.  The Romney commercial for Mourdock may prove to be Mitt's final, fatal albatross down the stretch.

Conclusion:  This Week's Discourse Friendlier to the President

The national trackers are not yet done pricing in President Obama's post-debate bounce.  Rasmussen has two more nights of sampling before doing so, and the President should gain tomorrow (since this was posted, Obama did gain 1 in Rasmussen to -3).  With Libya out of the national narrative, and a debate win and Mourdock in the narrative, the media will no longer be principally occupied with advancing the theme of Romney momentum.  As a consequence of the more Obama-favorable discourse of this week, we should see either continued modest motion toward Obama (my expectation based on today's fairly bullish data), or at worst a holding pattern, which with 12 days left, can only help the President.

The noxious face -

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQo8LRpap-Z_Q9dq3mw7cS4qEo3ylNQ5_8MRFfR0g6QwIzeZYEQ

Probably will hand Colorado to Obama in a squeaker.  Living in the conservative Hoosier land, it is nice to see a silver lining to conservative whackos that surround me.

Watching ODonnell on MSNBC, apparently Obama brought it up on Leno and made the comment "rape is rape."  I was thinking it might be worth 0.5% in the polls, but it may come to something like 1% in the swing states like Colorado.

Here is the DNC newest video, quite effective

http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/10/dnc-slams-romneys-mourd...

 

Momentum is on Romney's side. A poll that that that has plus 11 democrat can't change that fact.

accept this reality.

You may be right Anonymous (BTW - I still don't like Anonymous posts regardless of what Articleman says), Romney may still have big mo on his side and he may win the election.  This would of course be a tragedy for America.  Only, I get the sense from your post that you don't recognize how devastating for our country and our world it would be.  Am I right, do you actually hope that Romney wins?  If so, why?  What policies would Romney pursue that you believe would be beneficial?  Do you want more hard right Republican activists on the Supreme Court?  Would you like to see abortion rights cut back further?  Do you want to see more spending on the military, tax cuts for the wealthy, and reduced services for everybody else?  Are you a global warming denier?  Do you support off-shorers?  I look forward to your response.

You may be right Anonymous

Actually, Anon is not right. Romney got some big mo' after the first debate, but as A-man illustrates, he's got no mo' mo'. You can see the curve plainly over at fivethirtyeight.

Anon is not the only one with these odd blinkers. Media folks, Republicans, and even Democrats seem to have concluded that Romney's post-debate comeback put him on some kind irreversible trajectory.

But it's not true. Romney's surge leveled out and left him in second place, as he has been ever since this race began. Anyone who thinks otherwise should go grab themselves some cheap Romney stock at intrade. He's selling for 41, which is pretty much what he started at back in March.

41 is too high.

Hi Anonymous Republican,

We know one thing for sure, Republicans don't believe in math. The fact that you all keep getting 2+2=5 is proof enough for all sentient beings.

Hope that Sour Grape Kool-Aid tastes really great in November, maybe if you spike it with a good vodka you'll survive the next four years.

Momentum was on Romney's side.  It isn't now.  This morning's AP poll was pre-debate.

If things settle into a push, Romney loses.  I also think Tommy Thompson did Romney no favors in Wisconsin by relitigating 9/11.  There will be almost no Baldwin/Romney voters, and that exchange should hurt Thompson.

And now ad Colin Powell's endorsement. Seems he doesn't like the way Romney keeps changing his positions on things like Afghanistan and Iraq---plus a few dozen other reasons he prefers Obama to Romney.

Talk about the media narrative changing!

Shifting on Afghanistan and punting his complaints on Libya, taken as a piece, did not help Romney.

A-Man, isn't Romney in a real bind with that Indiana ad? If he takes it down might not he throw some votes to the third party candidate in Virginia? But if he leaves the ad running, it seems that obama can exploit it among suburban women in Va. and elsewhere.

It's a bind, but not a double-bind, because he can't take it down.  Period.  His base would rev less on November 6 if he's remotely squishy.  

It could prove the critical margin in the closest places.  NoVa, CO, and WI is where Obama lost and can regain 18-40 women.  Not binders full of them, mind you, just 18-40 of them.

Thanks. I just find it amusing how the Mourdock situation relates to Romney's choice to turn up his jugular in the last debate---which in itself must have left the base wondering---so he can't do it two times in a row. Unintended consequences, I love it.  

Also, both Obama and Romney have demonstrated how dangerous it is to sit on a lead you think you have.

Romney lost when he and the President clashed heavily in round two.  Romney's better plan in round three would have been to be polite, and agree pointedly at times, but with three or so lines of recurring attack.  

Romney's instincts failed him, as he tried too severe of a makeover, and thought he could microtarget moderate undecideds by that odd performance without any consequence with the 55 million other viewers.  The problem with that is if the election is about Obama you need to beat him more than me-too him.  Romney's strategy was ideal -- if he were up by 5 with Ohio put away. 

Let's not forget that even the first debate helped Romney close the gap with Hispanic voters, the damage of his pivot to the base during the primary could not be undone.  It will probably be the difference in Nevada and keep Colorado in play up to the last moment, when it could go either way.

Romney's selection of Ryan was all about solidifying that GOP primary voter bloc that didn't like him.  It's one thing to flip-flop toward a popular Afghan drawdown, quite another to suggest your base contains or likes anything offensive or wrong.

Right now at Politico, the most read post is Joe Scarborough's 'Two new polls scream Advantage Obama'. The narrative is beginning to change.  Romney's claims of things being in a dead heat will begin to be portrayed as wishful thinking and a state of denial.

TIME's poll should rattle the nerves of Romney supporters because the results run contrary to Team Romney's ongoing claim that their internal polls show a dead heat in the Buckeye State. Maybe that's the case among voters planning to go to the polls on election day but it looks like early voters are tilting dramatically in the president's direction. If the TIME poll is accurate, it means Mitt Romney will have to grab most of Ohio's remaining undecided voters if he wants to win this critical battleground state.

PPP released a Nevada survey yesterday that also shows President Obama holding a lead in this key swing state that remains outside the margin of error. Like Ohio, Nevada remains stubbornly in the Obama column. While Mitt Romney has made up ground in the three Southern swing states of Florida, North Carolina and Virginia, voters in Ohio, Nevada and Wisconsin seem do not seem inclined to be easily swept into Romney's camp.

Rasmussen's new Virginia poll shows Obama moving from -3 to -2.  The -2 reflects Obama improving with white voters several percentage points since last week, where Romney is flat and maxed out.  Romney made up the difference with a stronger performance in this Ras sample among black voters.  When I look at this poll, I think Obama is 50/50 in Virginia.  This is going to be very interesting.

Obama is in Richmond, Virginia today as is Ryan in Bristol, VA.  So both of the campaign's internal polls are showing that this definitely still up for grabs.

New Public Policy Polling surveys in Wisconsin and Iowa, conducted on behalf of Health Care for America Now, find Barack Obama expanding his lead in both states following his debate victory on Monday. In Wisconsin he leads 51-45, up from a 49-47 margin three weeks ago. In Iowa he’s now ahead by a 49-47 spread, a slight improvement from 49-48 last weekend.

Key findings from the surveys include:

-Obama hold small leads with independent voters in both states, 48/43 in Wisconsin and 47/46 in Iowa. The Iowa numbers represent a 9 point improvement for him from last weekend when he trailed 51/43 with independents.

-Obama holds a wide advantage over Romney in both states in terms of who voters trust more to protect Medicare. He leads 52/45 on that front in Wisconsin and 50/45 in Iowa. Voters also trust him more to stand up for the middle class, by a 52/44 spread in Wisconsin and a 51/46 one in Iowa.

-In Iowa Obama is already building up a substantial lead during the early voting period. 34% of voters say they’ve already cast their ballots and 68% of them report having supported Obama to only 32% for Romney. Romney does have a 55/39 lead with those yet to vote.

The Libya thing has been truly bizarre.  I was listening to Tom Sullivan on the day of the townhall debate.  It was all he would talk about.  Rush had been talking about it for weeks.  My mother, who used to be a true-blue Dem in the Clinton era and now listens to far too much AM talk as a source of actual information, even brought it up in conversation.  The whole thing about the videotape.  What did they know, when did they know it.  What were they hiding?  It was just damned weird.  They were really grasping at a whole lot of nothing.

It's interesting to see how the national security mantle has shifted in the last decade.  In the wake of 9/11, Dems were literal moral cowards without any authority in that scene.  They did not lead and hardly anyone trusted them to.  John Kerry, who actually served in combat, was turned into an effete traitorish guy.  The full measure of the failure in Iraq had to be felt.  Not to mention that Katrina didn't help anyone feel safer under GOP rule.

Now the Dems have sort of moved into owning an arguably more competent version of the Bush national security apparatus.  While I'm glad that the neocons don't seem to have their hands on those levers anymore, count me among those who are troubled by seeing better, more efficient flying death machines rather then fewer.

Anyhow, without taking the time to add up the states right now, I'm thinking we're gonna see Obama just north of 300, somewhere around 305.

To get over 300 Obama would have to take CO, VA, NH, IA, OH, and NV.  The first two will be the toughest and worth 22 electoral votes.  I'm pretty sure at this point he'll get the last four (not to mention WI).  But CO and VA are still in play - he just might do it. 

The Obama administration sort of tripped over their own feet on Libya, providing an opening for the right wingers to start some sort narrative in hopes it would turn out to be the October surprise. 

From what I've read (which isn't too much), this year Obama is having a difficult time with the military vote.  Given his hawkish foreign policy stance, while pushing the no-more-interventions policy, I would think he would be a little more popular with these demographic.

I'm hoping that Colin Powell will help with this demographic; especially vets. But who knows?  I mean, he IS black after all 

I think a lot of independent conservatives don't care about Obama or Powell being black. 

There are a lot of people in the military who come from military family, and like a lot of families military or otherwise, there is a tradition - "my daddy voted [insert party name], and his daddy voted [insert party name], and I will vote [insert party name]."

So one has to find a huge problem to break with tradition.  As Romney did his run to the center during the debates, I think a number of military personnel found the justification not to break with family tradition and vote Democratic.

Latest Comments