T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
I saw a homeless man named Howard kill himself in July of 1994. I was crossing the Chicago River by foot on the Clark Street bridge with my then-wife when he jumped ten feet into the river. He thrashed around without really swimming. She figured it out faster than me. We argued for a second. Then we agreed. She ran to the nearest pedestrians, a ways off, to try to find a phone to call 911. I ran to the foot of the bridge and raced down the concrete stairs to the plastic box holding the life preserver. I threw it on the water. He was already below the surface, bobbing up, then down. His eyes were bugging. He reached up toward the life preserver, several feet above him, then dropped out of sight in the dirty green water. I was the last person he saw. He drowned, out of sight.
The delay in calling 911? My companion asked several people for a phone, but not the tourist who was filming the episode, because she assumed the tourist would have volunteered his phone. Turns out, he had one, and filmed the suicide instead of dialing. The Chicago Police confiscated his video when they showed up. After dragging the river to find the suicide, the cops made me identify the body, as if there might be five homeless guys in the bottom of the Chicago River, and they needed my help to know they had the right one. The Tribune ran a short story. His name was Howard something; I've forgotten his last name. I tried to find out more about him. He was 47, had been living in a shelter. Felt like I should contact someone who knew him, do something to signify his death. The trail went cold, I couldn't figure out what to do, and I felt deeply empty. But my impulse, which I have since recognized and named in my head, was to bear witness.
I used to give innocuous homeless people money, to distribute some assistance and reward non-threatening behavior at once. On September 1, 1997, I got a big raise. I was thrilled. On the way home, at the bottom of the smelly stairs of the Grand stop on the Red Line, instead of handing the woman a dollar, as I often did, I gave her a twenty. She figured it out when I was down the platform, and I heard her yell out happily. That felt like witnessing.
I mess this stuff up. Often. When I was a new lawyer at my second firm, I thought a senior partner had a drug problem. He worked in the middle of the night. He was irresponsible, inaccessible, manic, frantic, walked out of meetings agitated, came back from the john red-faced, runny nosed, and strangely fulfilled. I had never seen a cocaine habit, but figured that was it. I didn't report my suspicion to anyone. No one reported their suspicions to anyone. In less than two years, after a failed stint in rehab and failed urine tests, his superb career and his marriage were gone. All of us who did nothing know we did wrong. It was his choices, but we stood by.
I have a relative who is a member of a hapless, ridiculed, and largely despised social group. We don't get along. Haven't spoken in five years. A senior colleague of mine, ostensibly referencing a client who is a member of that same hapless, ridiculed, and largely despised social group, took the occasion to call out that group as a bunch of "twisted, pathetic freaks." My sibling. I am a very thickly armored person. Very used to conflict and managing it. I almost cried. It was weird. I went home early.
A few months later, a pro bono case came across my desk, for a person in this hapless, ridiculed, and largely despised social group. A case about discrimination against them. So I took it. Bearing witness, and all. Argued it yesterday in a federal court of appeals. Several baby lawyers helped. They didn't hear the tirade, but I explained it to one of them. She gets it. I think she's bearing witness.
On the way to that same argument, in LAX, saw a guy in a mohawk get up briskly when his group was called, dropping his iPod and headphones on the floor between the rows of seated travelers. Everyone saw it drop. He was boarding quickly. I sprinted and caught him. He was grateful. I was pissed. How many people just let him lose it? Lots. They pretended not to notice me sprinting to the guy. Pretended not to notice me coming back. They're good at pretending not to notice. I'm not. It's not going to bring back the suicide man. It's not going to make right all the times I don't leap up. I fail, and succeed, and I try.
But I feel like Samuel Jackson at the end of Pulp Fiction, for having this idea, even for saying it out loud. I'm trying. I'm trying real hard to be a shepherd. When we're lucky, when we're strong, when we're happy, when we're loved, that's the best time of all to bear witness, isn't it? I feel those things, and the need to name the impulse, and the need to talk about it, especially now, around these holidays of leisure, and plenty. Peace to you and yours.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.