Destor on Ordering a Pizza Conservatively in Texas
Ramona: Hatred in a Lovely Church
Gallup: Obama 46, Romney 46
|
Destor on Ordering a Pizza Conservatively in Texas Ramona: Hatred in a Lovely Church Gallup: Obama 46, Romney 46 |
Read |
Pssst. I'd like to be president of the United States but before you vote for me, there's something you need to know. I believe, literally, that Star Wars is a true story. I believe in both the Old Testament story of Luke and Vader (parts IV-VI) and the New Testament origin of Vader (Parts 1-3 and The Clone Wars cartoon series).
Does this make me an unfit leader?
Before you say yes, consider that I'm a reasonable guy. I don't think, for example, that Star Wars has any bearing at all on life on Earth. It all happened a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. I don't think that humans evolved from Ewoks or that the Force works here of that you can make a lightsaber or travel through hyperspace. I just literally believe that everything in Star Wars actually happened somewhere at some distant point in time. Of course, I can't show you proof. But consider this... if the universe is infinite, then everything has to have happened, by definition. So don't even get me started on The Marvel Comics Universe.
So far as politics go, I'm making a relatively innocuous claim by believing in the literal truth of Star Wars. Since I believe that these true events happened far away and long ago, I don't make claims, as some religious adherents do, to moral authority, legal authority or land ownership. I just don't want to be mocked or criticized for my beliefs.
Over at the Washington Monthly, Ed Kilgore is chastising an "elites" for making fun of Rick Santorum's literal belief in a worldly and active Satan. Far better, says Kilgore, to engage Santorum on the substance of what he had to say about Protestants, Satan and the corruption of America, as Genghis has ably done for us already. I get why this makes sense. If you can make Santorum say what he really believes, which is that some of the very people who he is courting for votes are the dupes and pawns of the Big Evil, then you get to have some fun watching Santorum flail in the flames ignited by his own rhetoric.
Kilgore is probably right that letting Santorum get into the weeds of his own beliefs is better politics than just mocking a grown man for going around the country talking about devils. Besides, says Kilgore, most Americans believe in an actual Satan, far more intensely, it seems than my professed belief in the Book of Lucas.
Kilgore's concern is that "elites" who make fun of Santorum's hunt for the devil are just feeding into the myth Santorum is selling. Santorum's followers will view his critics as people duped by Beelzebub. How could Dan Savage so effectively sully Santorum's name without help from the depths of Hell?
Well, I'm sorry but you should not vote for me if I truly believe that Star Wars really happened, even if it has nothing to do with the policies I'd enact. A rich fantasy life is a wonderful thing, but there are limits, right? A belief in Satan as a living being who once rebelled against God in Heaven and now rules of the sulfurous pits of Hell is part of a rich fantasy life, too. It just happens to be a fantasy that many, if not most, Americans share.
I think we have to start talking more openly and honestly about this. What laws are really being pushed and passed based on such magical thinking? How rooted, really, are our policies in the world we inhabit, as opposed to the world we imagine?
For the sake of expedience, most Americans have embraced restraint with regard to religious issues. I stopped debating with my Israeli friends about the Middle East not because they ever changed my mind but because, in the end, I'd rather have Israeli friends than go down lonely, spitting arguments out of my pie hole. But it seems to me that, at least every now and then (and especially when a national-level politician brings it up) that we do have to debate about ghosts and goblins every now and then, no matter whose feelings get hurt.
By Ismail Kahn, New York Times, May 23/24, 2012
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — A Pakistani doctor who helped the Central Intelligence Agency pin down Osama bin Laden's location under cover of a vaccination drive was convicted on Wednesday of treason and sentenced to 33 years in prison, a senior official in Pakistan said.
A tribal court here in northwestern Pakistan found the doctor, Shakil Afridi, guilty of acting against the state, said Mutahir Zeb Khan, the administrator for the Khyber tribal region [....]
By Sergei L. Loiko, Los Angeles Times, May 23, 2012
MOSCOW — Stiff new penalties aimed at opposition protesters were given preliminary approval Tuesday by Russian lawmakers loyal to President Vladimir Putin, the target of mass rallies and demonstrations before his March election victory.
The bill, which opposition parliament members termed draconian and protested by threatening to file out of a legislative session, calls for fines of up to $50,000 and up to 200 hours of community service for organizers of rallies and demonstrations that grow violent or exceed the approved number of participants.
The sanctions were approved on first reading by parliament's lower house, which is controlled by Putin's United Russia party. They mark a return by the Kremlin to a tough stance against critics after concessions during the recent election campaign [...]
Also see:
Russians back Putin, strong leadership
Washington Post, May 22, 2012
A Pew survey of 1,000 Russians found that President Vladimir Putin is well-liked by more than 70 percent of citizens, especially older adults.
Associated Press, May 21, 2012
HAVANA — It was all sunshine, smiles and celebratory speeches as officials marked the arrival of an undersea fiber-optic cable they promised would end Cuba's Internet isolation and boost web capacity 3,000-fold. Even a retired Fidel Castro had hailed the dawn of a new cyber-age on the island.
More than a year after the February 2011 ceremony on Siboney Beach in eastern Cuba, and 10 months after the system was supposed to have gone online, the government never mentions the cable anymore, and Internet here remains the slowest in the hemisphere. People talk quietly about embezzlement torpedoing the project and the arrest of more than a half-dozen senior telecom officials.
Perhaps most maddening, nobody has explained what happened to the much-ballyhooed $70 million project....
By Tamasin Ford in Monrovia, Guardian.co.uk, May 22, 2012
Husbands, not strangers or men with guns, are now the biggest threat to women in post-conflict west Africa, according to a report by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) released on Tuesday.
The IRC report, Let Me Not Die Before My Time: Domestic Violence in West Africa, based on data collected over 10 years by the IRC in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Ivory Coast, said domestic violence is the "most urgent, pervasive and significant protection issue for women in west Africa" [.....]
By Lolita C. Baldor, Associated Press, May 22, 2012
WASHINGTON -- Uncle Sam may not want you after all.
In sharp contrast to the peak years of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the Army last year took in no recruits with misconduct convictions or drug or alcohol issues, according to internal documents obtained by The Associated Press. And soldiers already serving on active duty now must meet tougher standards to stay on for further tours in uniform.
The Army is also spending hundreds of thousands of dollars less in bonuses to attract recruits or entice soldiers to remain.
It's all part of an effort to slash the size of the active duty Army from about 570,000 at the height of the Iraq war to 490,000 by 2017. The cutbacks began last year, and as of the end of March, the Army was down to less than 558,000 troops.
For a time during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army lowered its recruiting standards [....]
To be fair to Kilgore, I think his myth-feeding remark was the minor point. His major point was that focusing on Santorum's belief in Satan per se misses the far more sinister element of his worldview--that those who disagree with Santorum's dogmatic ideas are Satan's pawns. That belief is not just silly, like the Destor Star Wars cult. It's scary as hell (figuratively speaking).
I had no idea you were into Scientology.
I am afraid this puts all of your prior posts in a new light or at least light saber!
And right here American politics, and perhaps even American culture, stand reconsidered on the prongs of the is-ought distinction. Certainly some of our policies are based on religious superstition, but still others are based on things we insist on believing - despite the evidence - for other reasons entirely. Maybe it's the belief that contractionary fiscal policy is expansionary. Maybe it's the belief that the War on Drugs has some kind of positive outcome. Maybe it's the belief that an increasingly draconian security state makes us safer. How deep does the rabbit hole go? Moreover, what would our policies look like if they were actually scaled against the evidence?