Thurston Howell Romney

When one has the Republican nominee being brutalized like this by David Brooks, who speaks to those moderate conservatives in the swing states like Florida and Virginia, it is pretty much over.  Romney is going to have to absolutely pound Obama in that first debate to stand a chance.  Just a few tidbits from his articles:

This comment suggests a few things. First, it suggests that he really doesn’t know much about the country he inhabits. Who are these freeloaders? Is it the Iraq war veteran who goes to the V.A.? Is it the student getting a loan to go to college? Is it the retiree on Social Security or Medicare?

The people who receive the disproportionate share of government spending are not big-government lovers. They are Republicans. They are senior citizens. They are white men with high school degrees. As Bill Galston of the Brookings Institution has noted, the people who have benefited from the entitlements explosion are middle-class workers, more so than the dependent poor.

The Republican Party, and apparently Mitt Romney, too, has shifted over toward a much more hyperindividualistic and atomistic social view — from the Reaganesque language of common citizenship to the libertarian language of makers and takers. There’s no way the country will trust the Republican Party to reform the welfare state if that party doesn’t have a basic commitment to provide a safety net for those who suffer for no fault of their own.

The final thing the comment suggests is that Romney knows nothing about ambition and motivation. The formula he sketches is this: People who are forced to make it on their own have drive. People who receive benefits have dependency.

But, of course, no middle-class parent acts as if this is true. Middle-class parents don’t deprive their children of benefits so they can learn to struggle on their own. They shower benefits on their children to give them more opportunities — so they can play sports, go on foreign trips and develop more skills.

Mitt is beginning to make W look like Curious George in comparison.  Well, ok, let's not exaggerate.  They both seem about as curious as a stump when it comes to taking the trouble to try to understand what life is like for the great unwashed.  Maybe taking in some reality and some facts feels too scary and overwhelming.  Unnecessary as well.  That's what handlers, fixers and the Koch brothers are for, right?  They bypass the need for the former King and now the wannabe King to expose themselves to possibly unpleasant facts or pesky reality checks.