T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
NEW YORK — There has been a recent discovery that an unidentified person walked into an unidentified establishment between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. sometime between Tuesday and Thursday this week. The person, reportedly between the age of 23 to 57, was possibly carrying “zero to four" bags, sources were unable to confirm.
The incident was originally reported at the Web site Drudge Report, under the headline “LIBERAL BAG-TOTING ACTIVIST REIGNS TERROR ON AMERICA.”
A nearby passerby said that there seemed to be something in the bags the person was carrying, if the person was, in fact, carrying bags.
“You could tell, something was being hidden in those bags,” said the nearby passerby. “Otherwise, why the bags? I mean, if there were bags?”
“WHY THE BAGS???” reported The Huffington Post in 156-point font size on its front page.
Many of the Internet’s most important bloggers immediately began to comment on the story.
“I think once again, in an age of total war on civilization, people have shown that they will walk anywhere with bags,” wrote Ace at Ace of Spades. “And the terrorist-coddling Left-wing treasonists will just let it happen.”
Later, John Aravosis of AmericaBlog chimed in with his views on a situation that many were describing as a potential, or non-potential incident, situation or action.
“Glenn Beck incites violence every, single day,” wrote Aravosis. “This is further proof that this incitement can only lead to incidents, even if those incidents are just potential, or not.”
Police later admitted that they lost track of the person with the bags, and that the person could be anywhere in the five boroughs, if, in fact, the person existed at all
“Yeah, we don’t know,” said an unidentified officer. “But there were bags. At least someone said there were bags.”
Moments ago, on Fox News, pundit Michelle Malkin said she believed that President Barack Obama was squarely to be blamed.
“There’s this person with bags, while we have a terrorist-loving President who wants to build a Mosque directly on top of the graves of those killed during 9/11,” said Malkin. “If we don’t round-up and put all Enviro-nut-case Muslims into camps – NOW – we’re just going to have more and more of these bag incidents and then be ruled by Sharia Law."
More on this story as it becomes directly and/or indirectly available.
–WKW
Crossposted at William K. Wolfrum Chronicles
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
Didn't you blog about this yesterday?