T-Mac: #Komenfail
Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs
Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way
|
T-Mac: #Komenfail Articleman as Particleman: The Science of Newt/RINOs Newt Sees Shadow, Crawls Back Into Hole: Six More Weeks of Primaries On Way |
Read |
Once again, Jesus Christ has exposed himself to mortals though a tasty snack. This time, his vehicle of choice was toasted cheese bread.
Jesus first started making appearances on starchy foods in 1977, when he imprinted his image on Maria Rubio's burrito tortilla in New Mexico. She built a shrine to honor the tortilla, and thousands flocked to see it. Since then, the faithful have discovered his holy likeness on a fish stick in Ontario, a potato chip in Florida, and a piece of chapati bread in Bangalore. Not to be outdone, Mother Mary appeared on a grilled cheese sandwich in Florida and pizza pan in Texas. She and Jesus later joined forces on a pancake, also in Florida, which seems to be a popular destination for the mother and son. Though she is less prolific, Mother Theresa has also made one notable appearance on a cinnamon bun in Tennessee.





The phenomenon of perceiving significance in random patterns is known as pareidolia. Religious pareidolia is not limited to the Christian faith. Muslims often perceive Arabic script from the Koran in unexpected places, from cuts of beef to satellite photos of the earth. Jewish Talmud scholars search the bible for meaningful numerical patterns. Singaporeans have discovered the mythical Monkey God in the calluses on a tree.



Of course, we can all laugh at the snack worshippers whom few believers take seriously. But I wonder, why is the notion of Jesus appearing on a cheese toast less tenable than God speaking from a burning bush or Jesus speaking into people's hearts? For that matter, what makes it more absurd than any of the miracles described in holy texts? For religious belief is an act of faith, and faith is not constrained by absurdity. To the contrary, doesn't the measure of one's faith correspond to the difficulty of maintaining one's belief? In that case, aren't the cheese toast devotees the most faithful of believers? Perhaps the roadside billboards should proclaim instead: HAVE FAITH IN CHEESES.
Huffington Post - A. Terkel/R. Grim begins report with:
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
and report includes:
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
This is downright frightening.
If I could offer advice to a young rebel, it would be to rummage the past for a body of thought that helps you understand and address the shortcomings you see. Give yourself a label.
Effective rebellion isn’t just expressing your personal feelings. It means replacing one set of authorities and institutions with a better set of authorities and institutions. Authorities and institutions don’t repress the passions of the heart, the way some young people now suppose. They give them focus and a means to turn passion into change.
As if the socio-political change is a matter of removing one set and plugging in the other set.
In the end, all Brooks once wants to do is point to the kids of today and say "aren't they being silly."
What Brooks wants to avoid is the messiness that comes from delving into the change where the outcome is not known before one set out ahead of time. It wraps this up by saying those who see it in a different way are merely motivated by personal feelings, which is about as asinine as it gets.
As they say, you read, you decide. Preview:
They'll still turn down Planned Parenthood again next time because of the supposed pass-through grant. Unless of course, Nancy Brinker was lying last night. So which is it?
“This represents nothing new. We have known and have reported that they are continuing five grants through 2012. This is a reference to that. The second clause about eligibility is certainly true. Any group can apply for anything. It does not mean they are going to get anything,” Ruse told LifeNews.
Geez, is the 'surrender' a trojan horse? Or in fact, not even a surrender, since ongoing current funding was not being stopped. According to this, it's all about the future funding processes, which is still not committed. Hmmm.
Once again, as ever, this bill (as many legislative actions) provides only the facade that our Nation's leaders are legislating what the country needs and holding themselves to the same standards as their constituents.
In truth, the proposed legislation does not provide the same oversight and consequences for Congressional insider trading malfeasance, as the rest of our nation's citizens are subject to under current insider trading laws.
We need to stand up and speak out that this is not good enough! Please, blog - send emails - call - communicate the facts to the WH, media and your own local governmental body, asking them to pass a resolution to be forwarded to your state's congressional members as well as the WH. Don't attack either party as all are culpable. A bi-partisan coalition none should support.
Well it took longer than I thought, but just a day longer. KOMEN has reversed course.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
Nancy Komen Brinker goes on to deny what happened and continues to say they were misunderstood, but the backlash has been enormous, and they have reversed course and apologize.
The thing is, I think this will continue to hurt them, as they've been found out, they support policies that that hurt women.
Yep, sorry Nancy, your days in the spotlight are probably over.
I will update this with some video soon.
I really like that God's sign that she should keep the cheese toast (though selling it was the first inclination!) could have been resolved with a phone call to technical support. This leads us to the inexorable conclusion that IT workers are more powerful than God.
Ok, so you know how I'm not really all that in to sharing personal details? The reasons maybe become clear to you as I relate this story. Please, no mocking.
I spent last Saturday night playing a trivia game at a local church. (I SAID NO MOCKING-It was for charity.)
One of the rounds was "Sold on eBay: Yes or No." Among the items included in the game were a pretzel shaped like the Virgin Mary and child and Jesus toast (sadly, no cheese).
Still, I suppose both of those items have more value than the imaginary friend somebody put up. Poor little friend. My feelings would be hurt if my friend tried to sell me on eBay.
If this "cheese toast" involves a slice of processed American then I'll take my Jesus toast dry, thank you.