Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
OK, I'm about to reveal - at no charge to you - the secret of success, in all aspects of life.
Pay close attention ... No, that's not the secret, I'm just letting you know you should pay attention because I'm about to reveal the secret.
You ready??? You sure?? Are you sitting down?? Notebook in hand???
Ok, ok, alright already, here it is (commence drum roll)....
------------->>>>>> REJECT REJECTION <<<<<<-------------
Oh, I know. It's not that impressive. It's trite. And it's fairly obvious, so calling it a secret is a bit of a stretch. Probably that exact phrase has already even been used in some 7-step, self-help book (I purposefully didn't Google it, cuz I didn't want to be dissuaded from writing this piece). If I were to be completely forthright, there are probably other, just as important keys to finding success in life - Do What You Love, Practice Often, Floss, Take Vitamins, Don't Waste Hours and Hours of Your Time on Facebook Games, etc. etc.
But I'm interested in making this as simple as possible, so we're shrinking the playbook, focusing on the core. And as simple as Reject Rejection may sound, trust me, it's a bitch of a mantra to truly absorb. (At first I was thinking of writing it as Don't Fear Rejection, or Embrace Rejection, but there's just something catchy and catch-22y about Reject Rejection)
The reason rejecting rejection is such a surprisingly tricky thing to accomplish is simple: We all inherently care about what people think of us, and of our work.
We seek affirmation, and feel lonely and dejected when we don't get it. Those are very tough emotions to let go of or ignore. I know I haven't yet learned how to do it, and it is very likely I won't be following my own advice anytime soon. But if you want to be successful, you should do what I say, and not what I do.
I first began obsessing over this philosophy last fall when I was finishing up a Gotham writing class, and the teacher was giving out his final pearls of wisdom before sending us on our way. The one thing he kept harping on was how often we were going to be rejected if we planned on pursuing writing for a career.
He in fact highly encouraged us not to send in samples of our work to literary magazines, editors or agents unless we were damn sure we were ready for the torrent of form rejection letters that would be hurled at us like so many poisoned darts. He kept going on and on ... You will be rejected. A LOT. Be prepared ... I had really liked our teacher up to that point, but he was beginning to piss me off.
Look, it's highly probable there weren't any undiscovered Hemingways in that class. We had all shared our writing with each other and none of us were that good. Some of the folks were barely literate. But who the fuck cares? We are told so often in our lives to be careful, and to be prudent, reminded about the long odds, and the need for fallback plans. What if we just went for it, and never stopped until we came to the end? If we didn't care about being rejected, if we rejected the concept of rejection, then failure literally wouldn't be an option, and wouldn't that be a thrilling way to live ...
Later that same week, I read Neurotick's humorous post about his problems meeting women, and it made me realize that a fear of rejection can have rather crippling effects on our personal lives as well as our professional ones. I can't begin to think about all the times I've seen a pretty girl in the street, or at a bar, maybe even noticed some flirty eye contact or smile flashed in my direction, and yet lacked the nerve to make a move, letting the opportunity pass ... all because I was afraid of being rejected. Again, why the fuck did I care? So what if I got rejected???? I wasn't likely ever going to see this person again - the only thing I had to be afraid of was my foolish, illogical pride.
And fear of rejection doesn't just get in the way of pursuing a career or finding a woman. It affects almost every decision we make.
On some level, of course, this makes sense as we are often only rewarded, monetarily or otherwise, when people approve of us or something we've done. But as I see it, rejecting - rather than fearing - rejection is ultimately a much more fruitful strategy for two main reasons.
1) Confidence sells.
Whether we're talking about flirting or job interviewing, there is no question that people respond well to confidence, even if it's misplaced. I may think a guy who goes over to a random woman and puts the make on her is annoying and overly cocky, but I've seen that approach work time and time again. One of my friends told me he had this college roommate who would hit on anybody. He'd be rejected A LOT, but he didn't take it personally and he also usually had a date. When you reject rejection and look like you truly don't care whether someone accepts what you're selling or not - like you're doing them a favor by offering it in the first place - you will get more favorable responses. Bank on it.
2) There's no accounting for taste.
Look, Independence Day did over $800 million in sales worldwide, and Arrested Development gets canceled after 53 episodes.
Genghis doesn't like Curb Your Enthusiasm, but doesn't mind dressing up in an outfit that looks like a Tropicana factory exploded on a Liberace-designed robot.
Some women like men with hard bodies, a full head of hair, and classically handsome facial features; some like scrawny men, with scraggly beards and thinning scalps, and large Semitic noses.
The point is, you will never EVER please everyone, so why get upset if one person, or dozens of people, decide they don't like you or what you've done. Examples abound of incredible artists who died penniless and mostly anonymous because their work wasn't appropriately recognized in their lifetimes. What if Walt Whitman had stopped writing poetry when critics panned his Leaves of Grass anthology? Or if Van Gogh had stopped painting when his first efforts disappointed family and critics alike?
And who cares if all those people rejecting you are right anyway? That you suck, and you're ugly, and will never amount to anything? As far as can be determined, we only get one shot at this living thing, and I can assure you that more people will respect you for following your heart and shooting for the stars than for hiding in a corner and watching the parade pass you by. Not that other people's opinions matter anyway. Remember, if you reject rejection, then the only ones who can fail are the ones who don't accept you.
So there it is. My secret to success in all aspects of life: Reject rejection.
Use it to your own advantage, or don't. I couldn't care less. (Ahhhh, if only that were so ...)
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
Deadman, I've been meaning to tell you this for a while. I don't know how to put it, so I guess I'll just come right out and say it:
I don't want to be your friend.
Ha. Just kidding. But really, you did set yourself up.
On the rejection front, it took me five years to finish what is not a very good novel, or at least not worth five years. At the end, I lollygagged and procrastinated and kept finding little things to change. But finally I finished. And then I got rejected. And I got rejected again. And again. And it really wasn't that bad. If I'm still being rejected a year or two from now, I might have a different outlook, but it's true that if you never try for fear of not getting what you want, you'll never get what you want.
honestly, who cares if you keep getting rejected? you put yourself and your work out there, and that's a brave and admirable thing. i've written tons of stuff, and even finished a couple items, only to shove them in the deep recesses of my computer's hard drive and let it rot there because i am convinced they're not good enough and i fear the rejection.
Well lucky for me, I'm a bit bipolar. On the days I think my writing is crap and I'll never get published, I just wallow. It's on the days I think I'm brilliant that I submit stuff.
Seriously, this is damn good advice. Although not as snappy as "Reject rejection," I think "Embrace rejection" or "Revel in rejection" would be more accurate terms.
I was struck that you used Walt Whitman as an example. His response to criticism was to actually absorb it, roll with it. So he rewrote and rewrote Leaves of Grass, adding and refining until it was polished like a stone. But he didn't take his ball and go home, and he certainly didn't stop writing for fear of further rejection.
You say this will help me meet women?
It worked for Bill.
Yeah, I agree with you; I think Revel in Rejection may be more accurate. plus, after writing the post, i did happen to Google the phrase Reject Rejection, and not surprisingly, I'm not the first to coin it. Even worse, most of the reject rejection links take you to very religious or vacuous self-help sites.
there was this funny reject rejection letter, though. (Various version of this letter are out there, so I'm not giving this guy any more originality points than I'm giving myself for reject rejection)
as far as this post helping you meet women, it most certainly will (if you can be unlike me and actually follow the advice). I can't guarantee it will help you score with women, but you'll meet them!!