Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
The secret to eternal youth may come in the form of stem cell injections, U.S. scientists claimed.
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh made the discovery after breeding mice with progeria syndrome, which causes rapid aging, and injecting them with stem-cell-like cells derived from young, healthy rodents.
You never know when a healthy rodent might come in handy!
This Ron Paul newsletter scandal reminded me of something that occurred almost a century ago.
hron-paul-and-the-racist-newsletters-fact-checker
In 1918 Henry Ford took over a newspaper called the Dearborn Independent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford#Mental_collapse_and_World_War_II
Wiki provides a nice neat rundown of this fiasco.
It would be funnier if certain Germans did not embrace many of the articles appearing in that newspaper—most of which were authorized by Ford, personally if not written by him. Then the newspaper got into the book business.
The newspaper published The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was discredited by The Times of London as a forgery during the Independent's publishing run. The American Jewish Historical Society described the ideas presented in the magazine as "anti-immigrant, anti-labor, anti-liquor, and anti-Semitic." In February 1921, the New York World published an interview with Ford, in which he said: "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on." During this period, Ford emerged as "a respected spokesman for right-wing extremism and religious prejudice," reaching around 700,000 readers through his newspaper …
Later the most anti-Semitic articles were republished in another book that the Germans really liked.
In a letter from 1924, Heinrich Himmler described Ford as "one of our most valuable, important, and witty fighters."[59] Ford is the only American mentioned in Mein Kampf
By 1927 Henry was attempting to disavow the most terrible articles printed in his paper:
At a libel trial in 1927 he claimed he neither wrote nor had knowledge of the content of those articles Sound familiar?
http://www.trutv.com/conspiracy/in-the-shadows/overthrow-fdr/gallery.html?curPhoto=8
Ford was being sued in Federal Court under a libel/slander theory.
http://www.americanbarfoundation.org/research/project/19
Within a year of this trial the Dearborn Independent was no more!
Many great writers have noted over the centuries that there never was and never would be an innocent man.
Ford was a violently dogmatic conservative and hater of unions but he invented the five dollar day for his workers.
His company eventually cut workers' hours and established benefits.
He was also a big employer of Black Americans. He saw characteristics in the Black Man that most white employers ignored.
From a strictly capitalistic perspective, Henry I wanted to keep his trained work force. He was upset when he saw his managers having to train in new workers because his trained workers were quitting to make better money elsewhere.
It appears that although he was a pacifist/isolationist like Ron Paul, his factories geared up for the First World War. (Wiki notes that Wilson wished Ford to run as Senator to help him out with his League of Nations idea)
He kind of lost command of his faculties during the 1930's following a few heart attacks, handing over formal executive powers to others.
I get on my high horse much too often; being prone to hyperbole and judgmental-ism; not that I am the only one with these afflictions!
Henry I made a vehicle to replace the horse. Oh he did not invent the car you might say.
But he did invent a manner of manufacturing that ultimately led to making a vehicle available to the masses; using laborers who could afford to actually purchase a vehicle they had a hand in manufacturing.
Just as an aside, the current epic television series about the building of the transcontinental railroad following the Civil War lays out all the terrible issues facing a new America including the Indian Wars and the abuse of minorities in the budding labor force.
| Hell on Wheels | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I have to stand back and put things into context. And I must compare our new nation's sins to the sins of other nations during the same time period.
The Russian Tsar might have freed the serfs in 1863, but it was surely a freedom granted in name only.
People were living in the sewers of London and Paris during this time period and needless battles were fought throughout Europe for no apparent logical reason.
I must conclude that Henry Ford was a great man of his time and this nation was better off with his insights and his ability to build an international manufacturing business.
I mean Edison was a prick from everything I have read but this nation was better off as a direct result of his inventions and his visions. He was terrible to his laborers.
I do not feel that Ron Paul in this day and age has accomplished anything compared with the masters of American Industry of yesteryear.
But his voice is a voice that must be heard.
And regardless of newsletters printed under his name and label a couple of decades ago, this nation is better off that he has had the opportunity to be heard amongst the cacophony of lies perpetrated by most of the other candidates running for the repub nomination.
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
Every so often MSNBC runs a documentary on Henry and his family. It's very good, well worth watching.
I agree that it's important Paul's ideology is heard, but what's not beneficial is it's all surface without any follow up as to what the true end result would be if most of what he touts is implemented.
IMHO, most who subscribe to what most of what he's touting would also continue to gorge themselves on rich desserts, even tho' they were gaining weight, because the packaging said no fats, no calories and guaranteed to be good for ya'.
But, and I take no pleasure in this fact, this is the same lack of thoughtfulness and common sense that most utilize in their decision processes, especially in the arena of politics.
Jees, nobody reads this piece and you read it twice in two places. hahaha
You have a point.
Ford and now Paul tell us war is wrong, keep our troops out of arenas that are none of our business..
I was reading a long essay at Salon. Paul is half liberal and half corporate oligarchist...
Simple answers to complex situations.
You really wish to cut the budget?
Well fire half of all the Federal Employees, get rid of SS, get rid of Medicare, get rid of the Department of energy, get rid of the EPA...
With the EPA gone, who would listen to Iowans screaming about all the crap Minnesotans are putting in the Mississippi?
Yeah.
That would cut the budget and destroy this nation. With half of Federal Employees fired, what the hell would our unemployment numbers amount to?
You have to admit though; how exactly would the Pentagon react to the election of a nut like Paul? hahaaahah
7 Days in May? hahahah
It's too bad that more haven't read this - it's an excellent analogy.
(It would be interesting if it comes down to Romney needing Paul's delegates to succeed. But, I think too much of Paul is 'smoke and mirrors' and he would easily capitulate to Romney. He would huff and puff but retain bragging rights with the caveat that he would need some quid pro quo - most likely something that would benefit his son.)