Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |

He sat recalling past sins; not capable of recalling past victories.
What victories for chrissakes?
It was then he knew, he absolutely knew that his mood had taken over his thought processes.
When you realize that you cannot trust your own thoughts, your own logic and your own perspectives how in the hell can you continue?
But he also was aware that he had come to this nihilistic conclusion before.
Funny, when you are 20 it is not so easy to escape.
The most recent loss is the most real loss is the most ominous loss.
This proves it! The 20 year old will opine.
When you are three times this age you find yourself in situations that are not so new.
Well I have been through this before.
The neurons fire in patterns and as patterns develop the outside world brings events that are more easily discerned (or mis-discerned) as one ages.
Well I have not been through what I am going through at this moment before.
History might not repeat itself but there appears to be an echo at times; at least Mark Twain tells us so.
But there I go again.
Mistaking echos for past events; or past memories of events. I mean what is an event? Oh do not go there because chaos awaits.
I can fall into the abyss of nothingness with no trouble at all.
I can talk myself into anything; I can think myself into anything.
I can perceive dangers that are not there; I can experience shame when no one is around; I can succumb to ghosts of things past so easily.
He laid the intravenous needle on the table.
After reflection, he walked that needle into the kitchen and dropped it into the garbage bin after glad wrapping it. How does one exactly glad wrap death? He pondered.
So what's on?
The knock came at the door.
YEAH, JUST A SECOND!
He had not bathed but he had to at least throw on a sweat shirt in order to package his true identity.
A sweat shirt over an under shirt looked better and besides, it went somehow with his other colored sweat pants.
Yeah, he responded as he opened the door.
The gurney and the EMT's appeared; out of nowhere.
You called?
Ahhhhhhhhhhh, no. Nobody here but me and I called no one and I am still ambulatiory!
The duo looked at each other and looked at the inmate and proceeded right on down the hall!
Ronald Reagan claimed that the Russian language had no word for "freedom." (The word is "svoboda"; it's quite well attested in Russian literature.) Ronald Reagan said that intercontinental ballistic missiles (not that there are any non-ballistic missiles—a corruption of language that isn't his fault) could be recalled once launched. Ronald Reagan said that he sought a "Star Wars" defense only in order to share the technology with the tyrants of the U.S.S.R. Ronald Reagan professed to be annoyed when people called it "Star Wars," even though he had ended his speech on the subject with the lame quip, "May the force be with you."
We seem to assume things told us at some point when we were not paying attention.
He thought.
Of course, how often do we pay attention?
Hitchens would label Ronny as an idiot.
And yet how many cities or states or countries had this guy Hitchens ever ruled?
Such is the arrogance of those who stand or sit or lie on the sidelines.
At a recent town hall in Osage, Iowa, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) responded to a question about the Labor Department’s stricter limits on child labor by claiming that they could exacerbate the child obesity epidemic by making kids less “active”:
Concern was raised about the proposed Department of Labor’s intent to greatly limit child labor on family farms.“This farm bill will greatly affect our FFA and 4-H programs,” said Grassley. “Kids won’t be able to help on farms not owned by their parents.“It’s interesting that this child labor bill goes against Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity initiative,” said Grassley. “How can kids be active if they are limited by this this law?"
He looked at his computer screen:
Several months ago, the nation’s biggest banks became embroiled in the “robo-signing” scandal, when it became clear that they had been approving thousands of foreclosures without verifying the proper documents or guaranteeing borrowers due process. The banks submitted fraudulent documents to courts and were forced to halt their foreclosures processes entirely as they sorted out what happened. “I had no idea what I was signing,” said one Bank of America employee. “We had no knowledge of whether the foreclosure could proceed or couldn’t, but regardless, we signed the documents to get these foreclosures out of the way.”
Then he opted for the couch and Law & Order.
He awoke wondering why he was not in bed.
Where the hell am I?
Things are not always as they seem.
If massive objects bend light rays as relativity claims, Mandl asked, why couldn't a relatively nearby star act as a sort of cosmic lens, magnifying the image of a more distant one? That, after all, is how an ordinary glass lens works — bending incoming beams of light to sharpen, expand or otherwise manipulate what we see. Worn down by Mandl's relentless prodding, Einstein did the calculations and concluded that yes, stars indeed could operate that way — although he added that "there is no great chance of observing this phenomenon...
The other discovery, which appears in the current edition of Nature, is more in keeping with Einstein's original concept, with individual stars rather than vast galactic clusters serving as gravitational lenses. As Einstein explained it — and as later scientists confirmed — every so often, a distant star drifts just behind a relatively nearby one, causing the faint light of the background one to be magnified. If the nearby star has a planet in tow, that much smaller body can act as a little lens of its own, making the background star brighten too, albeit less dramatically. This so-called microlensing will occur either before or after the main lensing event, depending on whether the planet leads or trails its parent star.
He heard a knock at the door or next door or a fallen painting or...
Okay, I shall peer out into the external abyss.
He arose and unlocked the door.
He stopped for a second and then thought:
What the hell?
As he opened his door to the 'real' world he noticed a box out in the hall at his threshold.
What?
He took the box to the couch after he had grabbed the smallest knife in his kitchen drawer.
No return address?
Well who am I to question gifts from the gods?
Slowly he cut open the cross of tape that covered the top of the gift.
As he finished his attempt at disclosure he slowly opened the flaps.
First the right/left flaps.
Then the up/down flaps.
As he removed the bubble wrap preventing a proper view of the treasure contained therein.
I'VE GOT IT!
Shades of Willy Loman.
DADA HE THOUGHT!
There were no questions, there was no bridge to Eden, there was nothing but that contained in the box.
The quest continues.
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.
This is beyond wonderful, DD. Beyond the moon and the stars, you have placed a stream of thoughts inside my head and I think you ... errr, thank you for that.
I doubt I have received such kudos in my entire life Smith. ha
Glad you enjoyed this!